2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT and X-ray contrast agents: Current clinical challenges and the future of contrast

Tyler C. Owens,
Nicolas Anton,
Mohamed F. Attia
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33−40 Therefore, we have designed an iodinated PBE (I-PBE) that contains a protonend-capping unit at the tip of the backbone, allowing basetriggered depolymerization, and iodophenyl pendants for X-ray attenuation as found in many organic radiocontrast agents. 41 The complete sequential cleavage of the repeating units could occur under basic aqueous conditions, leading to the formation of quinone methide monomers followed by hydration (right of Figure 1a). 38,42 Furthermore, the polymer agent was designed to generate synergistic effects with common biodegradable polymeric matrices as functional additives (Figure 1b).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33−40 Therefore, we have designed an iodinated PBE (I-PBE) that contains a protonend-capping unit at the tip of the backbone, allowing basetriggered depolymerization, and iodophenyl pendants for X-ray attenuation as found in many organic radiocontrast agents. 41 The complete sequential cleavage of the repeating units could occur under basic aqueous conditions, leading to the formation of quinone methide monomers followed by hydration (right of Figure 1a). 38,42 Furthermore, the polymer agent was designed to generate synergistic effects with common biodegradable polymeric matrices as functional additives (Figure 1b).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polymer agent was radiopaque due to the covalently attached iodides on each repeating unit, and its backbone was readily degradable under specific conditions. This agent was based on the functionalization of a self-immolative PBE because the backbone of PBEs completely depolymerizes to monomers in a head-to-tail fashion when triggered by a specific stimulus, and the phenyl pendant on each repeating unit provides synthetic flexibility for the engineering of material properties. Therefore, we have designed an iodinated PBE (I-PBE) that contains a proton-end-capping unit at the tip of the backbone, allowing base-triggered depolymerization, and iodophenyl pendants for X-ray attenuation as found in many organic radiocontrast agents . The complete sequential cleavage of the repeating units could occur under basic aqueous conditions, leading to the formation of quinone methide monomers followed by hydration (right of Figure a). , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the fact that the choice of preclinical models can be diverse, there are several challenges to designing a viable patient-delivered technology such as safety, stability, scalability, and cost of production. 663 , 678 The option of nanomaterials is an important influencing factor for clinical translation. Complex approval processes for new materials may prolong the time to clinical translation, as the safety and efficacy of NPs must undergo rigorous review.…”
Section: The Limitations/challenges Of Nanotechnology Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…179 However, these molecules can be cleared by the kidneys within minutes, whereas vascular imaging requires scanning times of up to several tens of minutes. 180 These features render it incompatible with vascular imaging. The use of polymer-or nanoparticle-based contrast agents is a possible solution to enable CT for vascular imaging, as these materials inherently have longer circulation times.…”
Section: X-ray Computed Tomography Imaging (Ct) Xray Computed Tomogra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common CT contrast agents are small molecules containing iodine or heavy metal atoms (such as gadolinium and other lanthanide elements) . However, these molecules can be cleared by the kidneys within minutes, whereas vascular imaging requires scanning times of up to several tens of minutes . These features render it incompatible with vascular imaging.…”
Section: Molecular Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%