2002
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.6.1791457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT and MR Imaging Features of Pathologically Proven Atypical Giant Hemangiomas of the Liver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…46 In a series of 25 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for giant hemangiomas, CT and MR images were reviewed retrospectively and revealed similar results in accordance with our findings. 47 Although hemangiomas can occur at any age, most of them grow very slowly and are rarely diagnosed during childhood. We observed 2 patients with more than 50% growth in 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 In a series of 25 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for giant hemangiomas, CT and MR images were reviewed retrospectively and revealed similar results in accordance with our findings. 47 Although hemangiomas can occur at any age, most of them grow very slowly and are rarely diagnosed during childhood. We observed 2 patients with more than 50% growth in 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT and magnetic resonance imaging point out to the correct diagnosis by showing an enhancing rim with globular vessels and centripetal filling, with sparing of the large central lacunar areas [26] . Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma may occasionally present as a large hypodense and multiseptated mass at CT scan, simulating a cystic lesion or a biliary cyst tumor.…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…US exams using contrast produce mild side effects in a small number of patients (17,19) . The diagnostic concordance between contrast US and magnetic resonance MR is over 90% in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas (4) . In spite of numerous studies, the true value of contrast ultrasound has not yet been clearly defined in our milieu.The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between contrast ultrasound and magnetic resonance MR in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This method has low specificity in the differential diagnosis of hepatic nodules, while colored Doppler does not detect vascularization in the majority of hepatic hemangiomas (11) . Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) are the imaging methods used to diagnose hepatic hemangiomas, both of which entail the use of contrast agents (2,4,7) . Contrasts for use in ultrasonography have been undergoing development since 1968 and the latest contrasts, considered second generation, are used in more than 60 countries (15,16) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%