CSR in Afghanistan: a global CSR agenda in areas of limited statehood

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -The purpose of this paper is to explain the emergence of CSR in Afghanistan as a novel context in the South-Asian CSR debate. Design/methodology/approach -The findings of the paper are based on case studies of four corporations in the Afghan mobile telecommunications industry. Multiple sources of qualitative data are coded according to the analytical framework of the paper to generate the findings. Findings -The findings highlight that the Afghan national setting can be conceptualised as an "area of limited statehood" indicating the weak national institutional setting, which enables space for manoeuvring for non-state actors to play a pivotal role in business-society relations. The paper highlights that the CSR practices are driven by the multi-level organisational field that through a unique blend of global coercive, mimetic and normative pressures lead to convergence around explicit CSR themes.Research limitations/implications -The findings are based on CSR practices that are explicitly stated and do not include informal and/or implicit business-society practices in such contexts. Originality/value -This paper combines the literature on areas of limited statehood and the neo-institutional theory to explain the emergence of CSR the Afghan mobile telecommunications industry. The paper advocates for a shift from a national setting focus to a multi-level institutional field lens in providing contextualised explanation of the emergence of CSR in developing countries.

The Role of Personal Values in Forming Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions in Developing Countries

“…After decades of political volatility, conflicts with the opposition and insecurity, Afghanistan's economy has recently experienced unparalleled growth in GDP of 10-22% annually. Economic growth has been attributed to low GDP baselines, the denationalization of the economy, and importantly, the massive influx of international assistance (Azizi and Jamali, 2016).…”

Working in a Physically Dangerous Work Environment: Employee Vitality and Sustainable Behavior

“…It is well said that every Afghan employee knows at least someone who was kidnapped for ransom [6], but despite such dangers, employees cannot stay home. Working outside home as employees in such a war-stricken zone exposes them to extreme external stresses, threats, hazards, and shocks e.g., being fired on or being near gunfire in the street; hearing bombs and gunfire in the distance; seeing people killed; experiencing arrest and torture; and being exposed to death and mutilation [7][8][9]. A recent report by the "Save the Children" organization showed that 550 children were dead as the result of war and conflict between these political parties in Afghanistan.…”

CSR and social conflict in the Brazilian extractive sector

“…This underscores the challenges of applying what might be global models of CSR to local contexts in developing countries, 76 or to areas of limited state presence or 'statehood'. 77 Emerging approaches to CSR tailored to fragile or developing contexts may be more helpful. Visser suggests CSR strategies should make clear economic contributions and account for 'dilemmas or trade-offs' such as economic development versus environmental protection.…”