2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSR gap and firm performance: An organizational justice perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing investment in CSR is based on the importance of sustainable societal development and the triple bottom line (Cantele and Cassia, 2020). The triple bottom line theory emphasises that CSR practices should fulfil economic, social and environmental responsibilities (Cao et al. , 2023) without undermining the corporations’ capacity to earn profits (Lii and Lee, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increasing investment in CSR is based on the importance of sustainable societal development and the triple bottom line (Cantele and Cassia, 2020). The triple bottom line theory emphasises that CSR practices should fulfil economic, social and environmental responsibilities (Cao et al. , 2023) without undermining the corporations’ capacity to earn profits (Lii and Lee, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Cantele and Cassia, 2020). The triple bottom line theory emphasises that CSR practices should fulfil economic, social and environmental responsibilities (Cao et al, 2023) without undermining the corporations' capacity to earn profits (Lii and Lee, 2012). Nearly 25 years ago, Watts and Holme (1999) defined CSR as 'the continuous commitment of enterprises to ethical behaviour, which contributes to economic development and improves the quality of life for employees and their families, local communities and the whole society, including social development and effective utilisation of environmental resources'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have had reason to relate so far to ethical leadership as it relates to outcomes (a) within the organization and (b) external to the inner workings of the firm, insofar as their effects impinge upon a variety of stakeholders and society in general. Returning to the relationship between CSR, firm performance, and organizational justice, Cao et al (2023) go beyond linear relationships between perceived justice and work outcomes to posit that the gap between CSR activities that benefit internal stakeholders (e.g., employees; Scheidler et al, 2019 ) and those on behalf of external stakeholders (e.g., business partners and the local community) clash at the expense of the employees with consequent negative outcomes for the latter group (and ultimately to the firm) because of the company’s resource limitations ( Rupp et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed above, organizational justice is linked closely to employee performance—and CSR-related activities are no exception. For instance, Cao et al (2023 , p. 1) noted the utility of OJ as a tool to measure relationships between CSR and employees’ behaviors (e.g., Rupp et al, 2006 ; De Roeck et al, 2014a ; Chen and Khuangga, 2021 ). A distinction is made between internal CSR, related to employees’ direct interests (e.g., training, care of employees, Farooq et al, 2017 ) and first-party justice ( Chen and Khuangga, 2021 ), while external CSR caters to CSR activities, such as charitable donations, environmental protection investment, and customer care ( third-party justice ), more concerned with society, the environment, and business partners ( Deng et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation