2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSF lactate alone is not a reliable indicator of bacterial ventriculitis in patients with ventriculostomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An elevated CSF lactate, procalcitonin, or their combination may be useful in diagnosing HAVM, and elevated serum procalcitonin may be useful in differentiating CSF abnormalities due to surgery or ICH from those due to bacterial infection [32••]. For CSF lactate, studies have shown cutoff values between 1.9 and 5.4 mmol/L to diagnose bacterial meningitis, but no single standard exists and not all data are conclusive, especially when a ventriculostomy is in place [35]. The cell index, assessing CSF cell counts in relation to serum counts, has been reported to have some value in diagnosing HAMV, even though the most convincing data (area under the curve of 0.825) for infection in hospitalized patients with ICH were documented in the setting of positive CSF culture [36].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An elevated CSF lactate, procalcitonin, or their combination may be useful in diagnosing HAVM, and elevated serum procalcitonin may be useful in differentiating CSF abnormalities due to surgery or ICH from those due to bacterial infection [32••]. For CSF lactate, studies have shown cutoff values between 1.9 and 5.4 mmol/L to diagnose bacterial meningitis, but no single standard exists and not all data are conclusive, especially when a ventriculostomy is in place [35]. The cell index, assessing CSF cell counts in relation to serum counts, has been reported to have some value in diagnosing HAMV, even though the most convincing data (area under the curve of 0.825) for infection in hospitalized patients with ICH were documented in the setting of positive CSF culture [36].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, a cut-off for CSF-lactate of >3.5 -4.2 mmol/l has demonstrated a high reliability in predicting a non-viral meningitis as con rmed by a recent study [3]. On the other hand, CSF-lactate values alone turned out to be of relatively low predictive value with respect to the development of a postsurgical meningitis in neurosurgical patients [7,8]. This has been con rmed by a recent study of neurosurgical pediatric patients and retrospective analysis of 215 CSF-samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While reference values of CSF-lactate are <2 mmol/l a CSF-lactate ≥4.2 mmol/l is regarded as a strong indicator of a non-viral meningitis [2] with a diagnostic sensitivity and speci city of up to 93-99% and 88-94%, respectively [3,4]. This has been demonstrated for patients after neurosurgical interventions as well [1,5,6] even though there are contradictive results [7,8]. Within the group of neurosurgical patients those with a temporary external-drainage of the CSF are under particular risk for developing an infection of the CSF and the central nervous system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of community-acquired meningitis patients reported high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (99%) for CSF lactate (cut-off >3.8 mmol/L) in distinguishing aseptic from bacterial meningitis [51]. However, CSF lactate is most likely to be useful in patients with very high or low values, with lesser utility in the 3-6 mmol/L range [52].…”
Section: Csf Features Of Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%