2004
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.2.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CSF Flow Quantification of the Cerebral Aqueduct in Normal Volunteers Using Phase Contrast Cine MR Imaging

Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow quantification differ according to the anatomical location of the cerebral aqueduct that is used and the background baseline region that is selected.Materials and MethodsThe CSF hydrodynamics of eleven healthy volunteers (mean age = 29.6 years) were investigated on a 1.5T MRI system. Velocity maps were acquired perpendicular to the cerebral aqueduct at three different anatomical levels: the inlet, ampulla and pars posterior. The pulse s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
66
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Regrettably, in many other studies where CSF movement in the aqueduct of Sylvius has been examined in physiological conditions by different MR imaging techniques, the obtained results did not allow presentation of the rate of CSF formation (V f ) neither from reported flow values nor from the CSF velocity (Baledent et al, 2006;Barkhof et al, 1994;Florez et al, 2006;Kim et al, 1999;Lee et al, 2004;Luetmer et al, 2002;Mase et al, 1998;Schroeder et al, 2000;Scollato et al, 2008;Stahlberg et al, 1989). The reason for this lies in the fact that attempts have been made to diagnose pathologic changes by means of other, more easily measurable hydrodynamic parameters in the aqueduct of Sylvius (see above).…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regrettably, in many other studies where CSF movement in the aqueduct of Sylvius has been examined in physiological conditions by different MR imaging techniques, the obtained results did not allow presentation of the rate of CSF formation (V f ) neither from reported flow values nor from the CSF velocity (Baledent et al, 2006;Barkhof et al, 1994;Florez et al, 2006;Kim et al, 1999;Lee et al, 2004;Luetmer et al, 2002;Mase et al, 1998;Schroeder et al, 2000;Scollato et al, 2008;Stahlberg et al, 1989). The reason for this lies in the fact that attempts have been made to diagnose pathologic changes by means of other, more easily measurable hydrodynamic parameters in the aqueduct of Sylvius (see above).…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Because the aqueduct has a constant diameter over a certain length, a rather constant flow pattern is present as opposed to, for example, the foramina of Monro where irregular flow patterns may be encountered. Cardiac cycle-related cerebral blood volume variations produce bidirectional oscillatory movement of CSF within the aqueduct (Barkhof et al, 1994;Florez et al, 2006;Greitz et al, 1993;Lee et al, 2004;Luetmer et al, 2002;Ohara et al, 1988). During systole, the net inflow of blood increases the intracranial volume and induces craniocaudal (systolic) CSF movement.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons for the occurrence of these errors are reported as non-linearity of the gradients, eddy currents, partial volume effects, and error in ROI placement (5,12,13). In cases with narrow aqueducts, the error rate can increase due to difficulty in ROI placement (14). Reliable flow quantification is reported to be feasible if the diameter of the lumen is greater than 1.5 mm 2 (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [94] obtained 3.7 ± 1.6 cm/s for the peak systolic velocity, while Marco et al [125] obtained maximal values of 4.5 ± 1.9 cm/s for systolic and 4.0 ± Baledent [82] is probably due to the difference of age. The age of our group was 40 ± 18 years old while the age of the group analyzed by [82] was 27 ± 4 years old.…”
Section: In Neurological Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%