2021
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2019.2912173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CrystalM: A Multi-View Fusion Approach for Protein Crystallization Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, a strategy that includes deep learning and PSSM profiles has been frequently adopted to realize the identification of unknown proteins and has achieved excellent results. However, the strategy is slightly inefficient, so in this work, we used other machine learning models and adopted RPSSM ( Ding et al, 2014 ), CSP-SegPseP-SegACP ( Liang et al, 2015 ), AATP ( Zhang et al, 2012 ), DWT ( Wang et al, 2017 ; Wang, 2019 ) and SOMA ( Liang and Zhang, 2017 ) to extract features from the PSSM matrix and make a comparison. Among them, AATP and CSP-SegPseP-SegACP have the highest MCC and AUC, so they are selected as feature extraction methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a strategy that includes deep learning and PSSM profiles has been frequently adopted to realize the identification of unknown proteins and has achieved excellent results. However, the strategy is slightly inefficient, so in this work, we used other machine learning models and adopted RPSSM ( Ding et al, 2014 ), CSP-SegPseP-SegACP ( Liang et al, 2015 ), AATP ( Zhang et al, 2012 ), DWT ( Wang et al, 2017 ; Wang, 2019 ) and SOMA ( Liang and Zhang, 2017 ) to extract features from the PSSM matrix and make a comparison. Among them, AATP and CSP-SegPseP-SegACP have the highest MCC and AUC, so they are selected as feature extraction methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we utilized accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) to evaluate the performance of our model 39,50–66 . They are calculated as follows: ACC=TP+TNTP+FP+TN+FN, SN=TPTP+FN, SP=TNTN+FP, MCC=TP×TNFP×FN()TPgoodbreak+FP()TPgoodbreak+FN()TNgoodbreak+FP()TNgoodbreak+FN. …”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional antioxidant drug screening and discovery are carried out through biochemical experiments, which not only has a long time period and high cost, but also has the risk of failure in experiments ( Lv et al, 2020a ; Cheng et al, 2020 ; Cheng Y et al, 2021 ; Lv Z et al, 2021 ; Dong et al, 2021 ; Goto et al, 2021 ; Zeng et al, 2022 ). With the continuous improvement of computer technology and genome databases, methods such as data mining and machine learning are more and more widely used in biological information, drug screening and other fields ( Cheng et al, 2018 ; Wang et al, 2018 ; Ding et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2019 ; Zeng et al, 2020a ; Zhang CH et al, 2020 ; Zhang J et al, 2020 ; Lyu et al, 2020 ; Zhao X et al, 2021 ; Niu et al, 2021 ). In recent years, many researchers have been exploring machine learning models suitable for identifying antioxidant proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%