1987
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(87)90042-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallography of martensitic transformation in TiNi single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…under stress observed with respect to Fig. 24 also supports the mechanism (strictly speaking, the Schmid factors were the largest or the second largest in this case [131].). As the other checkpoint, we may compare the amount of the recoverable strain with experiment.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Superelasticity Effectsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…under stress observed with respect to Fig. 24 also supports the mechanism (strictly speaking, the Schmid factors were the largest or the second largest in this case [131].). As the other checkpoint, we may compare the amount of the recoverable strain with experiment.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Superelasticity Effectsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The first report on the habit plane measured by two-surface analysis on Ti-Ni single crystals was made by Saburi et al [138] and Miyazaki et al [139]. More complete work on the crystallography of the transformation in a Ti-Ni alloy was done by Matsumoto et al [131], who measured habit plane, orientation relationship and shape strain simultaneously on single crystals and made critical comparison with the theory. The results of their calculations are essentially the same as those by Knowles and Smith.…”
Section: Crystallography Of B2 ! B19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the paper by Knowles and Smith [11] and that by Matsumoto, Miyazaki, Otsuka and Tamura [12], the calculations based on the phenomenological theory, are referred to. The rational interface plane, (1, 1, 0) for ƒ ϭ 0.2710 and (1, 1, Ϫ1) for ƒ ϭ 0.3102, were also reported by both groups.…”
Section: Comparison With Phenomenological Theory Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis suggests that the crystallographic transition 2 19 can be described by operations of rotation of the basis 2; matrices are used to perform rotation and shear for monoclinic distortion of unit cell. To provide for one-to-one correspondence of the 2 and 19 structures in terms of crystallography, we applied the orientation relations obtained by the workers in [5]. Matrices were calculated to perform rotations for each out of twelve possible variants of martensite 19 , which are equivalent in terms of crystallography.…”
Section: Crystallographic Analysis Of the Fragmentation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%