2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-014-1203-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallographic studies of [NiFe]-hydrogenase mutants: towards consensus structures for the elusive unready oxidized states

Abstract: Catalytically inactive oxidized O2-sensitive [NiFe]-hydrogenases are characterized by a mixture of the paramagnetic Ni-A and Ni-B states. Upon O2 exposure, enzymes in a partially reduced state preferentially form the unready Ni-A state. Because partial O2 reduction should generate a peroxide intermediate, this species was previously assigned to the elongated Ni-Fe bridging electron density observed for preparations of [NiFe]-hydrogenases known to contain the Ni-A state. However, this proposition has been chall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,24,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Most notably Li and Hall in 2001 performed calculations on multiple model structures for the Ni-A state and found that a hydroxide bridge is most likely, albeit with a reduced, protonated thiolate. 24 Recent work by Pardo et al 27 predicted a sulfenated cysteine as well as a hydroperoxo bridging ligand, following previous suggestions by Volbeda et al 28 The latest crystal structure determination by Volbeda et al, 39 however, contains an oxygenated thiolate, S=O and a hydroxide bridge. A misconception is that O 2 is required for formation of Ni-A; Albracht et al have shown that oxidation with molecular oxygen exclusively gives rise to the Ni-B state within 158 ms. 22 Additionally, O 2 is a triplet state, and the presence of an intact O 2 molecule near the active site would completely alter the EPR spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…9,24,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Most notably Li and Hall in 2001 performed calculations on multiple model structures for the Ni-A state and found that a hydroxide bridge is most likely, albeit with a reduced, protonated thiolate. 24 Recent work by Pardo et al 27 predicted a sulfenated cysteine as well as a hydroperoxo bridging ligand, following previous suggestions by Volbeda et al 28 The latest crystal structure determination by Volbeda et al, 39 however, contains an oxygenated thiolate, S=O and a hydroxide bridge. A misconception is that O 2 is required for formation of Ni-A; Albracht et al have shown that oxidation with molecular oxygen exclusively gives rise to the Ni-B state within 158 ms. 22 Additionally, O 2 is a triplet state, and the presence of an intact O 2 molecule near the active site would completely alter the EPR spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…All variants contain a significant fraction of Cys-75 in the oxidized sulfenate form that has recently been assigned to the unready NiA and NiSU states (41). The different sulfenate conformation in T18V might explain the different NiA EPR signal that is observed for this variant (Fig.…”
Section: Figure 4 Epr Spectra Of Fes Clusters Of the Thr-18 S Varianmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…5A). The signal was recently assigned to a persulfide containing state called Ni-S ox (41 (Fig. 5B).…”
Section: Figure 4 Epr Spectra Of Fes Clusters Of the Thr-18 S Varianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is more flexibility in the choice of the fourth ligand . For example the most solvent exposed (distal) cubane found in [FeFe]‐hydrogenase from Clostridium pasteurianum and [NiFe]‐hydrogenase from Desulfovibrio fructosovorans features histidine as a fourth ligand (Figure b). Carboxylic group of the aspartate side chain (Figure c) is most probably one of the ligating agents in ferredoxin from Pyrococcus furiosus , and iron–sulfur assembly protein A (IspaA) from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are observed in nature, e.g. former in [FeFe]‐hydrogenase from Clostridium pasteurianum and latter in [NiFe]‐hydrogenase from Desulfovibrio fructosovorans . Protonation of these two ligands leads to structures denoted as t‐HisH and p‐HisH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%