2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4628(20010124)79:4<742::aid-app190>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization study on absorbable poly(p-dioxanone) polymers by differential scanning calorimetry

Abstract: An investigation was carried out on the crystallization behavior of p‐dioxanone polymers using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Kinetic analyses were performed on data collected primarily during isothermal crystallization. Isothermal data were treated within the framework of the classical Avrami equation. Using this approach, both the Avrami exponent, n, and the crystallization half‐time, t1/2, were evaluated and their implications are discussed for each system studied. It is shown that a small change … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Avrami exponents showed a moderate variation (i.e., between 3.76 and 2.77), with the lowest values being determined for high cooling rates and the average value being close to 3.0. These exponents are lower than those previously reported by Zhang et al [ 24 ] (i.e., 4.26–3.40) and in good agreement with those given by Andjelic et al [ 4 ] for low crystallization rates (i.e., 3.0), although in this case a value of 1.1 was found for high crystallization rates. Isothermal crystallization studies also indicate slightly contradictory values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Avrami exponents showed a moderate variation (i.e., between 3.76 and 2.77), with the lowest values being determined for high cooling rates and the average value being close to 3.0. These exponents are lower than those previously reported by Zhang et al [ 24 ] (i.e., 4.26–3.40) and in good agreement with those given by Andjelic et al [ 4 ] for low crystallization rates (i.e., 3.0), although in this case a value of 1.1 was found for high crystallization rates. Isothermal crystallization studies also indicate slightly contradictory values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Isothermal crystallization studies also indicate slightly contradictory values. Thus, minimum changes with crystallization temperature were determined by Andjelic et al (i.e., exponents varied between 2.22 and 2.62, with 2.5 being the average value) [ 4 ], but a systematic increase (i.e., from approximately 2 to 3.8) was also reported [ 6 ] for higher isothermal crystallization temperatures (i.e., from 30 to 80 °C). The last behavior was interpreted as a consequence of a change from instantaneous to sporadic nucleation as T c was increased [ 6 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations