2017
DOI: 10.20903/csnmbs.masa.2008.29.1-2.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization of Polypropylene: Application of Differential Scanning Calorimetry Part I. Isothermal and Non-Isothermal Crystallization

Abstract: A b s t r a c t: Theoretical background of the crystallization of isotactic polypropylene is summarized with respect to the potential of DSC method applied for the analysis of isothermal and non-isothermal processes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, PP nanocomposite results from DSC and NMR demonstrated the addition of a nucleating agent to an unfilled semicrystalline polymer brings about the change of polymer crystallization rate and crystalline structure [ 26 ]. However, for the melting point of the nanocomposite, it remained almost the same for all different nanofiller concentrations and MAH contents ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, PP nanocomposite results from DSC and NMR demonstrated the addition of a nucleating agent to an unfilled semicrystalline polymer brings about the change of polymer crystallization rate and crystalline structure [ 26 ]. However, for the melting point of the nanocomposite, it remained almost the same for all different nanofiller concentrations and MAH contents ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-noted that the influence of pristine TiO 2 and TiO 2 -NH 2 (Figure 4b and 4c) on the polymer crystallization is low in comparison with the other two fillers; all curves and Tc for all for cooling rates are similar to pure iPP. Nevertheless, it was possible to see that during the non-isothermal crystallization, the temperature for these composite shifted towards higher temperature; with this behaviour, it is possible to state that this filler is acting as heterogeneous nuclei, which could which could reduce the crystallization time of the iPP (Raka & Bogoeva-Gaceva, 2017;J. Wang & Dou, 2007).…”
Section: Analysis: Non-isothermal Crystallization Of Ippmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As is known, the formation of transcrystalline structures is associated with the occurrence of interactions between the filler and the polymer matrix. Scientists note that because of the chemical modifications carried out, very often the filler is characterized by a reduced ability to nucleate in the polymer matrix [73][74][75], which they justify by removing, for example, impurities during filler processing. An interesting conclusion was reached by Borysiak et al [4], who treated wood chemically with ammonium ionic liquids and obtained a plastic filler characterized by a significantly lower density of the transcrystalline layer in the tested composite systems than polymers with unmodified wood.…”
Section: Analysis Of Crystallization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%