2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization of alkanes under quiescent and shearing conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the subscript α denotes the Cartesian component which can be X, Y or Z. θ α is the angle between the α axis of the simulation box and the chord vector which connects every other pair of carbon atoms in a same molecule [55] , shown in the upper inset of Fig.6. The order parameter can range from −0.5 (full order perpendicular to α axis) to 1.0 (full order parallel to α axis), with a value of 0 in the case of isotropic orientation (see the lower inset in Fig.6).…”
Section: Shear Induced Ordered Structure Of the Confined N-hexadecanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the subscript α denotes the Cartesian component which can be X, Y or Z. θ α is the angle between the α axis of the simulation box and the chord vector which connects every other pair of carbon atoms in a same molecule [55] , shown in the upper inset of Fig.6. The order parameter can range from −0.5 (full order perpendicular to α axis) to 1.0 (full order parallel to α axis), with a value of 0 in the case of isotropic orientation (see the lower inset in Fig.6).…”
Section: Shear Induced Ordered Structure Of the Confined N-hexadecanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties depend on the morphology of the semicrystalline state, i.e. on the distribution of crystallites sizes and shapes, which is in turn caused by the crystallization process [1]. In the last seven decades a large amount of work has been done to understand the crystallization of polymers but still there are a number of question which are either unanswered or controversially answered [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,11 Their model exhibited good agreement with experimental data, in support of the viewpoint that FEN can be explained by flow-induced entropy reduction in the melt; however, it must be considered to be a phenomenological model due to its rigid assumptions about the nucleus shape and its reliance on unknown thermodynamic parameters. At the molecular level, there have been simulation efforts using both Monte Carlo (MC) [13][14][15] and Molecular Dynamics (MD) [16][17][18][19][20][21] to study FIC; however, relatively few focused specifically on the kinetics of nucleation. 22 Given that nucleation is a transient event, a MC simulation cannot accurately capture its kinetics without an enormous amount of prior knowledge regarding the dynamic processes in the melt and their rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that when crystallization occurred under an applied uniaxial stress, nascent crystalline nuclei formed; however, their growth was suppressed. Jabbarzadeh and Tanner 20,21 performed constant-pressure, non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulations of crystallization under shear and observed that steady shearing increases the crystallization rate for both C20 and C60 chains, and that pre-shearing increases the crystallization rate for C60 and longer C162 chains, but has no discernable effect for C20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%