1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00543904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization kinetics of Fe40Ni38Mo4B18 and Fe80B20 metallic glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The glass subjected to constant heating rates in DSC for 10, 20, 40 and 80 K min-1 between 320 and 1000 K exhibited two exothermic peaks (the typical DSC trace for the heating rate 10K rain -~ is shown in figure 1). This agrees with the results of Antonione et al (1978) but shows disagreement with other results which reported three (Majumdar and Nigam 1980;Cumbrera et al 1982b) and four (Nicolai et al 1981) exothermic peaks, However, it can be noted that the peak temperatures for the first and second peaks reported by these investigators agree well with the present values. Additional support for the two-stage crystallization is found in the fact that for a variety of (FeNiMo)B glasses, Antonione et al (1980) have found only two stages.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrysupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The glass subjected to constant heating rates in DSC for 10, 20, 40 and 80 K min-1 between 320 and 1000 K exhibited two exothermic peaks (the typical DSC trace for the heating rate 10K rain -~ is shown in figure 1). This agrees with the results of Antonione et al (1978) but shows disagreement with other results which reported three (Majumdar and Nigam 1980;Cumbrera et al 1982b) and four (Nicolai et al 1981) exothermic peaks, However, it can be noted that the peak temperatures for the first and second peaks reported by these investigators agree well with the present values. Additional support for the two-stage crystallization is found in the fact that for a variety of (FeNiMo)B glasses, Antonione et al (1980) have found only two stages.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Employing non-isothermal DSC measurements, Antonione et al (1978) reported two-stage crystallization processes at 703 K and 777 K having activation energies of 296 and 334 kJ tool -~ respectively for the first and second crystallization reactions. However, Majumdar and Nigam (1980) and Cumbrera et al (1982b) observed a three-stage crystallization of the glass. DTA measurement by Majumdar and Nigam (1980) showed crystallization peaks at 728, 810 and 863 K. Cumbrera et al (1982b) determined activation energies both from Kissinger (288 and 355 kJ mo1-1) and isothermal (288 and 451kJmo1-1) methods using DTA, DSC and resistivity measurements for the first two crystallization processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The E value for MS1 obtained by Kissinger approach was in close agreement with those obtained by Kurajica et al [21] and Antonione et al [17]. The activation energy for MS1 and MS2 reported in literature [17][18][19][20][21][22] has been presented in Table 4. It can be seen from this table that there was a large scatter in the E values determined by different approaches for both MS1 and MS2 and these were ranging from 280 to 451 kJ/mol for MS1 and from 270 to 403 kJ/mol for MS2.…”
Section: Kinetic Studiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The sequence of nucleation of these two phases was in agreement with those reported by Mizgalski et al [13]. However, Nicolai et al [20] and Cumbrera et al [22] have reported appearance of these two phases in reverse sequence. From the size and size distribution analysis shown in Fig.…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, Majumdar and Nigam observed three stage crystallization in the material [12]. Cubrera et al carried out a quantitative investigation on the crystallization kinetics and estimated the activation energies of the two phases using both non-isothermal and isothermal methods employing DSC, DTA and resistivity measurements [13]. The respective values obtained were &2.984 eV/atom and &3.678 eV/atom from non-isothermal and &2.984 eV/atom and &4.673 eV/atom from isothermal methods for the first and second phases respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%