2002
DOI: 10.1002/1439-2054(20020401)287:4<272::aid-mame272>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization Behavior in Poly(propylene) Containing Wollastonite Microfibrils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these parameters are related to the crystallization behavior of polymer and its dependence on the incorporation of different additives in the polymer together with the processing conditions used for molding. Many studies have been reported in the past, including by the present authors, on the crystallization behavior of PP containing wide ranges of additives 5–12. These studies showed that large changes occur on the induction time, crystallization half‐time, spherulite size, etc., due to the presence of additive.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these parameters are related to the crystallization behavior of polymer and its dependence on the incorporation of different additives in the polymer together with the processing conditions used for molding. Many studies have been reported in the past, including by the present authors, on the crystallization behavior of PP containing wide ranges of additives 5–12. These studies showed that large changes occur on the induction time, crystallization half‐time, spherulite size, etc., due to the presence of additive.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The main diffraction angle (2θ) region of interest (5 to 30°) only has been shown in which PP exhibits five intense peaks. It can be recognized that, in all these cases, the crystalline structure of PP is α‐type (monoclinic a = 6.66 Å, b = 20.8 Å, c = 6.49 Å, and β = 99.6) 4, 5, 11–13. However, it can be noted that the relative intensities of these peaks depend on both the composition and the cooling rate used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The increase in X c of iPP with the fillers might be due to local crystallinity formation around the filler particles. An increase in crystallinity of iPP matrix with GB [61, 86–89] and W [36, 73–76, 90–94] was reported previously. Yuan et al [87–89] found that β‐crystal formation of iPP increased with increasing GB content and decreasing GB size because of an increase in GB surface area acting as nucleation site for β‐crystals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This might be due to a higher specific surface area of acicular W than that of spherical GB (Table 1). An increase in T c of iPP with GB [21, 23, 61, 78, 88, 97] and W [73–76, 90, 92, 93] due to the enhanced nucleation was reported earlier. Stricker and Mülhaupt [21, 23] found that GB nucleated iPP matrix as evidenced by increasing T c of iPP with GB although X c of iPP remained unchanged with GB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In most of these studies, the emphasis was placed on the nucleation, preferential growth, and so forth 6–10. However, it is well known that the rate of cooling plays an important role in determining the crystallinity and/or morphology obtained in the final product made by melt processing 11. Because the thermal conductivity of the filler and that of the composite containing that filler are important factors governing the heat‐transfer process, we felt that a systematic investigation into the role of thermal conductivity in the crystallization of PPs containing different fillers would lead to a better understanding of these phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%