1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1986.tb02720.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization and vitrification in aqueous systems

Abstract: SUMMARY Some key ideas and experimental findings concerning the probability that crystallization of a liquid or its binary solutions will occur at moderate cooling rates are discussed. The use of cryoprotectants and of pressure to favourably influence these probabilities is rationalized, and some of the newer findings on small sample supercooling phenomena are reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Better diffraction results are obtained when crystals are¯ash-cooled to temperatures below water's bulk glass transition at T g 9 140 K by immersion in a liquid cryogen (nitrogen or propane) or by insertion into a cold stream of gas (nitrogen or helium). Characteristic cooling times, limited by the crystal's thermal conductivity and heat capacity and by heat transfer to the surrounding medium, are estimated to be $0.1±1 s (Teng & Moffat, 1998;Walker et al, 1998) and are long compared with important microscopic timescales in bulk water (Angell & Choi, 1986).…”
Section: Slow Versus Fast Cooling: Crystalline Versus Amorphous Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better diffraction results are obtained when crystals are¯ash-cooled to temperatures below water's bulk glass transition at T g 9 140 K by immersion in a liquid cryogen (nitrogen or propane) or by insertion into a cold stream of gas (nitrogen or helium). Characteristic cooling times, limited by the crystal's thermal conductivity and heat capacity and by heat transfer to the surrounding medium, are estimated to be $0.1±1 s (Teng & Moffat, 1998;Walker et al, 1998) and are long compared with important microscopic timescales in bulk water (Angell & Choi, 1986).…”
Section: Slow Versus Fast Cooling: Crystalline Versus Amorphous Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At temperatures below the temperature corresponding to "r,ose, a regime is entered that is dominated by the quenching of particle fluctuations, resulting in an increase in To,t as icecrystal formation is greatly retarded. For pure water, Tnose is of the order of 10 -6 tO 10 -10 S (Angell & Choi, 1986). If cooling is performed on a timescale that is fast compared to Those, only limited crystallization will occur.…”
Section: Principles Of Cryoprotectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has plagued the field of cryoelectron microscopy for decades and numerous techniques have been developed to suppress the formation of ice lattices in biological specimens. Excellent reviews describing the various methods of cryoprotection and the underlying physicochemical principles are available (Angell & Choi, 1986;Steinbrecht & Zierold, 1987;Echlin, 1992). Here, we concentrate on the principles of Kanno, Speedy & Angell (1975) and Franks (1985)].…”
Section: Principles Of Cryoprotectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Addition of organic solutes to the stabilizing solutions used for protein crystals lowers the freezing point of the respective solutions and slows down the crystallization kinetics of ice [15]. The first condition for a cryoprotective buffer is that the buffer should, at a given cooling rate, not show any detectable crystalline ice.…”
Section: Cryoprotection Of Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%