Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s18-1038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CrystalFeel at SemEval-2018 Task 1: Understanding and Detecting Emotion Intensity using Affective Lexicons

Abstract: While sentiment and emotion analysis has received a considerable amount of research attention, the notion of understanding and detecting the intensity of emotions is relatively less explored. This paper describes a system developed for predicting emotion intensity in tweets. Given a Twitter message, CrystalFeel uses features derived from parts-of-speech, ngrams, word embedding, and multiple affective lexicons including Opinion Lexicon, SentiStrength, AFFIN, NRC Emotion & Hash Emotion, and our in-house develope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies analyzed the four emotions in different periods of the pandemic using the CrystalFeel algorithm ( Garcia & Berton, 2021 b; Lwin et al, 2020 b; Shah et al, 2021 ), which has been proven in recent works to be accurate. In this study, the emotional strength scores of the CrystalFeel algorithm (R. K. Gupta & Yang, 2018 ) were used to label the dominant emotions of fear, anger, sadness, and joy at different phases of the pandemic according to the timeline of WHO tweets and U.S news during the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. In the CrystalFeel algorithm, topics are labeled based on emotion score (i.e., emotional valence refers to feelings’ polarity) in three different categories including: (i) No-specific emotion, (ii) If valence-score is higher than 0.520, then the emotion category is “joy”; (iii) If valence-score is lower than 0.480, then the emotion category is: (1) “anger” if and only if the anger intensity-score is higher than both the fear and sadness intensity-scores, (2) “fear” if and only if the fear intensity-score is higher than both the and sadness intensity-scores, and (3) “sadness” if and only if sadness intensity-score is higher than both the anger and fear intensity-scores ( Garcia & Berton, 2021 b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies analyzed the four emotions in different periods of the pandemic using the CrystalFeel algorithm ( Garcia & Berton, 2021 b; Lwin et al, 2020 b; Shah et al, 2021 ), which has been proven in recent works to be accurate. In this study, the emotional strength scores of the CrystalFeel algorithm (R. K. Gupta & Yang, 2018 ) were used to label the dominant emotions of fear, anger, sadness, and joy at different phases of the pandemic according to the timeline of WHO tweets and U.S news during the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. In the CrystalFeel algorithm, topics are labeled based on emotion score (i.e., emotional valence refers to feelings’ polarity) in three different categories including: (i) No-specific emotion, (ii) If valence-score is higher than 0.520, then the emotion category is “joy”; (iii) If valence-score is lower than 0.480, then the emotion category is: (1) “anger” if and only if the anger intensity-score is higher than both the fear and sadness intensity-scores, (2) “fear” if and only if the fear intensity-score is higher than both the and sadness intensity-scores, and (3) “sadness” if and only if sadness intensity-score is higher than both the anger and fear intensity-scores ( Garcia & Berton, 2021 b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study, address this gap by collecting tweets generated from January 2020 to May 2021 and by analyzing the public opinions and emotions by applying advanced machine learning technique, including the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic ( Blei et al, 2003 ) and CrystalFeel algorithm ( Gupta & Yang, 2018 ). More importantly, the extraction of different categories of content features and the building of a predictive model that assesses the popularity of tweets by using the number of retweets (based on the content of posted tweets) is another gap in the literature that we addressed in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If sentic patterns are not matched, the input sentence will be processed through hybrid Sentic-LSTM [56], a sentiment-augmented LSTM on a bag of concepts, to obtain a sentiment polarity value. In addition, the emotions of PORs were analyzed further using the algorithm CrystalFeel (www.crystalfeel.socialanalyticsplus.net accessed on 15 August 2020, [57]), a high-accuracy sentiment analytic tool.…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, sentiment analysis techniques are very advanced, and many software are openly available, such as Stanford's CoreNLP, CrystalFeel, VADER, SenticNet, SentiStrength, and SentiCircles. The sentiment analysis in the current study was based on CrystalFeel algorithm, a sentiment analytics tool whose accuracy had been well-established (Gupta & Yang, 2018). This model categorized each emotion into four discrete emotions in Plutchik's framework of emotions (Plutchik, 2001), including joy, surprise, and trust (positive), and anger, fear, sadness, and disgust (negative).…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%