2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.79.245119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal-water-induced switching of magnetically active orbitals inCuCl2

Abstract: The dehydration of CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O to CuCl 2 leads to a dramatic change in magnetic behavior and ground state. Combining density-functional electronic structure and model calculations with thermodynamical measurements, we reveal the microscopic origin of this unexpected incident-a crystal-water-driven switching of the magnetically active orbitals. This switching results in a fundamental change in the coupling regime from a three-dimensional antiferromagnet to a quasi-one-dimensional behavior. CuCl 2 can be well… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,30,31 Unfortunately, there are no established LSDA+ U parameters for copper oxychlorides, although the recent application of U d = 6.0− 8.5 eV to CuCl 2 and CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O can be used as a reference. 28,29 In our calculations, we employ several representative and physically reasonable values of U d over a wide range, namely, 3.5, 5.5, and 7.5 eV. 34 Below, we will show that all these values lead to qualitatively similar behavior; although the details of the microscopic scenario depend on the U d value used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,30,31 Unfortunately, there are no established LSDA+ U parameters for copper oxychlorides, although the recent application of U d = 6.0− 8.5 eV to CuCl 2 and CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O can be used as a reference. 28,29 In our calculations, we employ several representative and physically reasonable values of U d over a wide range, namely, 3.5, 5.5, and 7.5 eV. 34 Below, we will show that all these values lead to qualitatively similar behavior; although the details of the microscopic scenario depend on the U d value used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…10 The precise value of the U eff parameter for copper oxyhalides is unknown, although a recent study of CuCl 2 and CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O suggests U eff = 4 eV. 28,29 In the present work, we employ the representative value U eff = 4.5 eV, as commonly used for copper oxides ͑see, e.g., Refs. 30-33͒.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second (supercell) approach, the correlation effects were treated in a mean-field approximation within the band structure calculations by applying the LSDA+U method. 26 The on-site Coulomb repulsion parameter U d was varied in the 6 − 8 eV range, [27][28][29][30] while the on-site exchange parameter J d was fixed to 1 eV. Total energies for different types of collinear magnetic ordering were obtained within the crystallographic unit cell and the two supercells, doubled along the b or c directions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b)). Magnetism is dominated by the intra-chain coupling between Cu 2+ (S = 1/2) ions, and competition between ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor interaction and antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction stabilizes the helimagnetic ground state below 24 K. [25][26][27] Recent powder neutron scattering study suggested the cycloidal magnetic order propagating along the b-axis, with spin spiral confined in the bc-plane ( Fig. 1(b)) and propagation vector q ∼ (1, 0.226, 0.5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%