2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal transition from cellulose I to cellulose II in NaOH treated Agave americana L. fibre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
106
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(58 reference statements)
8
106
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…All diffraction patterns showed peaks around 2ϴ= 15, 22, 24 and 30°, indicating the structure of cellulose type I (Oudiani et al, 2011). There was a difference between the peaks and this was due to the changes in intensities which represent the crystallinity differences of the fibers.…”
Section: Crystallinity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All diffraction patterns showed peaks around 2ϴ= 15, 22, 24 and 30°, indicating the structure of cellulose type I (Oudiani et al, 2011). There was a difference between the peaks and this was due to the changes in intensities which represent the crystallinity differences of the fibers.…”
Section: Crystallinity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The differences observed in these indexes are related to the ratio of cellulose in the fiber shown in Table 1. Oudiani et al (2011) report that those diffractograms with 2ϴ = 14° and 2ϴ = 16° peaks correspond to amorphous material such as lignin, hemicellulose, pectin, and amorphous cellulose and in percentages lower than 20% of NaOH. The peaks that were not marked were considered to be of low crystallinity cellulose, containing a lower ratio of amorphous cellulose.…”
Section: Crystallinity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where I002 is the maximum intensity of diffraction of the (002) lattice peak at a 2θ angle between 22° and 23° and Iam is the diffraction intensity of the amorphous material, which was taken at 2θ angle between 15° to 19° where intensity was at the minimum level [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%