1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00157-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure of the C2 fragment of streptococcal protein G in complex with the Fc domain of human IgG

Abstract: Protein G and protein A have developed different strategies for binding to Fc. The protein G:Fc complex involves mainly charged and polar contacts, whereas protein A and Fc are held together through non-specific hydrophobic interactions and a few polar interactions. Several residues of Fc are involved in both the protein G:Fc and the protein A:Fc interaction, which explains the competitive binding of the two proteins. The apparent differences in their Fc-binding activities result from additional unique interac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
306
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(315 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(98 reference statements)
9
306
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Met256 and Met432 are in the CH2-CH3 interface, where residues that are important for the binding to protein A [3], protein G [11], and the neonatal receptor (FcRn) [12] reside. Oxidation of Met256 and Met432 resulted in significant conformational changes in the CH2 domain [3], which decreased binding to protein A and protein G [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Met256 and Met432 are in the CH2-CH3 interface, where residues that are important for the binding to protein A [3], protein G [11], and the neonatal receptor (FcRn) [12] reside. Oxidation of Met256 and Met432 resulted in significant conformational changes in the CH2 domain [3], which decreased binding to protein A and protein G [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The migration of Fc receptor function may have been a consequence of the need to shift the binding site in the antibody Fc from the C3/C4 interface in the IgY-like ancestor of IgG and IgE, due to competition from bacterial Fc-binding proteins. Such proteins are known to bind to the C␣2/C␣3 interface in IgA (60) and the C␥2/C␥3 interface in IgG (61,62), thereby disabling the immune response by blocking FcR interactions. This selection pressure has led to co-evolution of IgA and its receptor (63); a receptor mutating too slowly to keep up with changing bacterial peptide sequences becomes redundant and may persist only as a pseudogene (as in rabbits) (63) or be eliminated altogether (as in mouse) (64).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, also the *Corresponding author. Fax: (46) (8) 6954084. structures of SPG immunoglobulin-binding domains in complex with Fab [18] or Fc [19] have been described. The structure of an individual domain consists of a mixed parallel/antiparallel fl-sheet of four strands, with a single c~-helix packed onto the sheet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%