1999
DOI: 10.2138/am-1999-11-1217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure and compressibility of a two-layer polytype of pseudowollastonite (CaSiO3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insights into the topology of CaMgSi 2 O 6 liquid at low pressure may be obtained by reviewing the 1‐bar volume of fusion data not only for diopside, but also for enstatite (Mg 2 Si 2 O 6 ) and pseudowollastontite (Ca 2 Si 2 O 6 ). In Figure 10, the molar volumes of crystalline enstatite, diopside, and pseudowollastonite (calculated from the data of Hugh‐Jones [1997], Richet et al [1998], Yang and Prewitt [1999], and Tribaudino et al [2000]) are shown relative to the molar volumes of liquid Mg 2 Si 2 O 6 , CaMgSi 2 O 6 , and Ca 2 Si 2 O 6 (calculated from Lange [1997]), all at 1 bar and 1670 K. The results show that the volume of fusion for pseudowollastonite (2.7%) is substantially smaller relative to those for enstatite (17.8%) and diopside (16.7%). The difference in magnitude is due entirely to the much larger crystalline volume of the pyroxenoid, pseudowollastonite, relative to those for the pyroxenes, enstatite, and diopside.…”
Section: Density Of Liquid Camgsi2o6 Versus Crystalline Diopside Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Insights into the topology of CaMgSi 2 O 6 liquid at low pressure may be obtained by reviewing the 1‐bar volume of fusion data not only for diopside, but also for enstatite (Mg 2 Si 2 O 6 ) and pseudowollastontite (Ca 2 Si 2 O 6 ). In Figure 10, the molar volumes of crystalline enstatite, diopside, and pseudowollastonite (calculated from the data of Hugh‐Jones [1997], Richet et al [1998], Yang and Prewitt [1999], and Tribaudino et al [2000]) are shown relative to the molar volumes of liquid Mg 2 Si 2 O 6 , CaMgSi 2 O 6 , and Ca 2 Si 2 O 6 (calculated from Lange [1997]), all at 1 bar and 1670 K. The results show that the volume of fusion for pseudowollastonite (2.7%) is substantially smaller relative to those for enstatite (17.8%) and diopside (16.7%). The difference in magnitude is due entirely to the much larger crystalline volume of the pyroxenoid, pseudowollastonite, relative to those for the pyroxenes, enstatite, and diopside.…”
Section: Density Of Liquid Camgsi2o6 Versus Crystalline Diopside Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molar volumes of crystalline enstatite, diopside, and pseudowollastonite at 1670 K and 1 bar (shown in open triangles and calculated from Hugh‐Jones [1997], Richet et al [1998], Yang and Prewitt [1999], and Tribaudino et al [2000]). The molar volumes of Mg 2 Si 2 O 6 , CaMgSi 2 O 6 , and Ca 2 Si 2 O 6 liquids at 1670 K and 1 bar are shown in solid triangles and are calculated from Lange [1997].…”
Section: Density Of Liquid Camgsi2o6 Versus Crystalline Diopside Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still unknown whether the corner-sharing perovskite-structured silicates could provide a lattice site large enough to accommodate the Sr 2+ cation. SrSiO 3 crystallizes in a monoclinic structure (C2/c, Z = 12) at ambient conditions (Nishi 1997a) isotypic to the hightemperature modification of CaSiO 3 (pseudowollastonite) (Yang and Prewitt 1999) and SrGeO 3 (Nishi 1997b). The typical features of the pseudowollastonite-type SrSiO 3 are alternate layers of ternary (Si 3 O 9 ) tetrahedral rings and close-packed Sr atoms stacked along the [001] direction forming a six-layer-repeated structure (Nishi 1997a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6), with three O-O interatomic distances close to 2.9 Å and O-O-O angles close to 60 . Such a threefold ring has been encountered as Si 3 O 9 rings in silicates of the related wollastonite CaSiO 3 (Yang & Prewitt, 1999;Joswig et al, 2003) and Ge 3 O 9 rings in PbGe 4 O 9 (Bush & Stephanovitch, 2002) and Sb 2 Ge 3 O 9 (Ke et al, 2002). In the latter the Ge 3 O 9 rings are connected by pairs to trigonal pyramids SbO 3 .…”
Section: The Ca 6 Al 12 O 24 Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%