2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure and chiroptical spectra of sodium tetrakis (+)-hfbc Pr(III) complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that the Na–La complex gives no CD couplet, but only a single positive CD in 2–0.02 mM EtOH and a CD couplet in 2 mM CHCl 3 , whereas other M I –La compounds show CD couplets in both 2 mM CHCl 3 and 2 mM EtOH. 47, 49, 50 The observation of a couplet CD indicates the existence of a chiral helical configuration, whereas a single CD suggests the disruption of the chiral configuration toward [Ln((+)–hfbc) 3 ] as a result of the facile solvation by EtOH. It is also interesting to note that the g lum values of M–Eu solutions are quite larger than those of [Eu((+)–hfbc) 3 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting to note that the Na–La complex gives no CD couplet, but only a single positive CD in 2–0.02 mM EtOH and a CD couplet in 2 mM CHCl 3 , whereas other M I –La compounds show CD couplets in both 2 mM CHCl 3 and 2 mM EtOH. 47, 49, 50 The observation of a couplet CD indicates the existence of a chiral helical configuration, whereas a single CD suggests the disruption of the chiral configuration toward [Ln((+)–hfbc) 3 ] as a result of the facile solvation by EtOH. It is also interesting to note that the g lum values of M–Eu solutions are quite larger than those of [Eu((+)–hfbc) 3 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the CD intensities in the intraligand transition were concentration dependent in EtOH (going from a weaker CD couplet to a single CD band with lowering the concentration), while there is a smaller concentration dependence in CH 3 CN. 47, 49, 50 In our previous report, we showed that the variation in the CD couplet was due to the contribution of two different species present in solution, SAPR–8–Cs[Eu((+)–hfbc) 4 ] and [Eu((+)–hfbc) 3 ] or pseudo achiral DD–8–[Eu((+)-hfbc) 4 ]. 47 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…78 Also, chiral tetrakis chelate complexes with four 3-heptafluorobutyryl-( þ )-camphorates (( þ )-hfbc), Na[Ln(( þ )-hfbc) 4 ] Á CH 3 CN, takes D-SAPR-8 configuration. 79,80 This complex is stabilized by interaction of the fluorocarbon moiety with the Na ion in CHCl 3 . The structure was determined on the basis of the exciton CD (see below), although the X-ray structure analysis showed only one pseudo-enantiomer with "pseudo-achiral D 2d configuration."…”
Section: Lanthanide Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure was determined on the basis of the exciton CD (see below), although the X-ray structure analysis showed only one pseudo-enantiomer with "pseudo-achiral D 2d configuration." 79,80 There have also been a number of compounds formed with tetra-azo-cyclododecane-based ligands such as the tetraphosphinate complex shown in Figure 5.23. These complexes have approximate C 4 symmetry.…”
Section: Lanthanide Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%