2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2006.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal growth kinetics in (GeS2)0.2(Sb2S3)0.8 glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the crystal phase of In 2 S 3 is responsible for the first CP in the present glass. In addition, the XRD spectra recorded that the crystal phase of Sb 2 S 3 which precipitated prior to GeS 2 are in agreement with the sequence of phase transformation in Ge–Sb–S glass ceramics . Therefore, the Sb 2 S 3 crystal phase is related to the second CP whereas the GeS 2 crystal phase is corresponding to the transformation of the third CP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Consequently, the crystal phase of In 2 S 3 is responsible for the first CP in the present glass. In addition, the XRD spectra recorded that the crystal phase of Sb 2 S 3 which precipitated prior to GeS 2 are in agreement with the sequence of phase transformation in Ge–Sb–S glass ceramics . Therefore, the Sb 2 S 3 crystal phase is related to the second CP whereas the GeS 2 crystal phase is corresponding to the transformation of the third CP.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…9 undercooled melt (E g = 513 ± 8 kJ mol À1 ) [16]. A lower ratio (about 59%) has been reported for crystallization of glassy As 2 Se 3 [30] and (GeS 2 ) 0.3 (Sb 2 S 3 ) 0.7 glass [7].…”
Section: Comparison Of Crystal Growth and Dsc Datamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The crystallization kinetics of antimony trisulfide in (GeS 2 ) x (Sb 2 S 3 ) 1 À x glasses (x = 0.2 and 0.3) has been reported recently [7,8]. These studies combine standard analysis of DSC data of overall crystallization process, the microscopic study of the crystal growth kinetics and viscosity behavior of undercooled melts of the pseudobinary system of GeS 2 -Sb 2 S 3 composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both ˛M and ˛∞ p help to decide the choice of the kinetic model. On the basis of the Málek method, the function that best describes the mechanism can be chosen from the shape of the plot of the standardized curves y(˛) and z(˛) [31][32][33][34]. The maximum M of the y(˛) function and ˛∞ p of the z(˛) function suggest the choice of the most suitable kinetic model characterizing the curing process studied.…”
Section: Curing Kinetic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%