1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(98)01171-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal growth, fabrication and evaluation of cadmium manganese telluride gamma ray detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very recent and promising candidate is cadmium manganese telluride (CMT) [3]. Its distinct advantages of good compositional homogeneity and a highly tunable band gap compared to CdZnTe have encouraged CMT detector developments in recent years, bringing large improvements in the performance of CMT as a high resistivity single crystal radiation detector [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very recent and promising candidate is cadmium manganese telluride (CMT) [3]. Its distinct advantages of good compositional homogeneity and a highly tunable band gap compared to CdZnTe have encouraged CMT detector developments in recent years, bringing large improvements in the performance of CMT as a high resistivity single crystal radiation detector [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the physical properties of CdMnTe (CMT) and CdZnTe (CZT) are very similar, CMT crystals show poorer performance as X-ray and gamma detectors; furthermore, controlling their electrical properties was very difficult due to the high concentrations of residual impurities arising from the impure starting materials [1,2]. Despite these drawbacks, one important difference favoring the usage of CMT rather than CZT is the fact that segregation coefficient of Mn in the CdTe host is close to 1, thereby ensuring a uniform alloy composition within largevolume ingots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these drawbacks, one important difference favoring the usage of CMT rather than CZT is the fact that segregation coefficient of Mn in the CdTe host is close to 1, thereby ensuring a uniform alloy composition within largevolume ingots. Reportedly, cadmium vacancies in CdTe-based semiconductors are successfully compensated by doping with indium, chlorine, or aluminum [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to its unique magnetic and magnetooptic properties [1], Cd 1−x Mn x Te crystals can be used in many device applications [2] and offer several potential advantages over Cd 1−x Zn x Te as a material for room-temperature X-and gamma-ray detectors [3,4]. The band gap range 1.7 eV to 2.2 eV, required for substantiating an "ideal" radiation detector performance, can be realized with a relatively low (< 50%) amount of Mn compared with that of Zn in Cd 1−x Zn x Te (up to 70%) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%