1983
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221190225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal field splitting in NdAl3 studied by inelastic neutron scattering

Abstract: Inelastic neutron scattering experiments are performed in polycrystalline NdAI, t o determine the crystalline electric field parameters for the NdS+ ion in its hexagonal environment. The parameters obtained are checked with the results of other measurements related to the crystalline electric field, such as magnetic susceptibility, heat capacity, and electric resistivity.An polykristallinem NdAI, werden inelastisclie Neutronenstreuexperimente durchgefuhrt, um die elektrischen Kristallfeldparameter fur Nd8+-Ion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the hexagonal structure allows a change of the lattice parameter ratio c/a under hydrostatic pressure p. We have performed INS experiments for PrAl 3 ( p = 0) and NdAl 3 ( p = 0 and 0.84 GPa) which allowed for an unambiguous determination of the CF parameters. Our data clarify earlier INS studies of the CF in these compounds which resulted either in different possible sets of CF parameters for PrAl 3 [1][2][3][4] or uncertainties about the CF ground state in NdAl 3 [5]. The CF parameters obtained in the present work are examined with regard to extrapolation schemes based on the extended point-charge model (PCM) and first principles density functional theory (DFT).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, the hexagonal structure allows a change of the lattice parameter ratio c/a under hydrostatic pressure p. We have performed INS experiments for PrAl 3 ( p = 0) and NdAl 3 ( p = 0 and 0.84 GPa) which allowed for an unambiguous determination of the CF parameters. Our data clarify earlier INS studies of the CF in these compounds which resulted either in different possible sets of CF parameters for PrAl 3 [1][2][3][4] or uncertainties about the CF ground state in NdAl 3 [5]. The CF parameters obtained in the present work are examined with regard to extrapolation schemes based on the extended point-charge model (PCM) and first principles density functional theory (DFT).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…'μΥδҥ ±·¨¢Ò¥ Å μ¤´μ¨μ´´ Ö ¢μ¸ ¶·¨¨³Î¨¢μ¸ÉÓ, ¢ÒΨ¸²¥´´ Ö ¤²Ö´ °¤¥´´μ£μ´ ¡μ· ¶ · ³¥-É·μ¢ Š . ' ¶²μÏ´Ò¥ ²¨´¨¨Å · ¸Î¥É¸ÊÎ¥Éμ³ ³μ²¥±Ê²Ö·´μ£μ ¶μ²Ö¨É´Ê Õ ¢μ¸ ¶·¨¨³Î¨¢μ¸ÉÓ ³μ¦´μ ¶·¥¤¸É ¢¨ÉÓ ¢ ¢¨¤¥ ¢²¥´´μ° [13], μ¤´ ±μ ¶ · ³¥É·Ò Š μ ¶·¥¤¥²¥´Ò¸¡μ²ÓÏ¥°´ ¤¥¦´μ¸ÉÓṎ Éμδμ¸ÉÓÕ. Éμ £² ¢´Ò³ μ¡· §μ³¸¢Ö § ´μ¸É·¥³Ö μ¡¸ÉμÖÉ¥²Ó¸É¢ ³¨:¸ ¶¥±-É·Ò,¨ §³¥·¥´´Ò¥´ ¸ ¶¥±É·μ³¥É·¥ …',´¥¸μ¤¥·¦ ²¨Ëμ´μ´´μ£μ ¢±² ¤ ; · §·¥Ï¥´¨¥ ¡Ò²μ §´ Ψɥ²Ó´μ ²ÊÎÏ¥, Î¥³ ¢ ¶·¥¤Ò¤ÊÐ¨Ì Ô±¸ ¶¥·¨³¥´É Ì [13] μ¤´μ¢·¥³¥´´μ ´ ²¨ §¨·μ¢ ²¨¸Ó É·¨É¥³ ¶¥· ÉÊ·Ò, ÎÉμ ¶μ §¢μ²¨²μ ¢±²ÕΨÉÓ ¢ ´ ²¨ § Ô´¥·£¨¨¨¨´É¥´¸¨¢´μ¸É¨¡μ²ÓÏ¥¥ Ψ¸²μ ¶¥·¥Ìμ¤μ¢¸¢μ §¡Ê¦¤¥´-ÒÌ Ê·μ¢´¥°.…”
Section: ‹ˆ ‡unclassified
“…¶²μÏ´Ò¥ ²¨´¨¨Å · ¸Î¥É¸ÊÎ¥Éμ³ ³μ²¥±Ê²Ö·´μ£μ ¶μ²Ö¨É´Ê Õ ¢μ¸ ¶·¨¨³Î¨¢μ¸ÉÓ ³μ¦´μ ¶·¥¤¸É ¢¨ÉÓ ¢ ¢¨¤¥ ¢²¥´´μ° [13], μ¤´ ±μ ¶ · ³¥É·Ò Š μ ¶·¥¤¥²¥´Ò¸¡μ²ÓÏ¥°´ ¤¥¦´μ¸ÉÓṎ Éμδμ¸ÉÓÕ. Éμ £² ¢´Ò³ μ¡· §μ³¸¢Ö § ´μ¸É·¥³Ö μ¡¸ÉμÖÉ¥²Ó¸É¢ ³¨:¸ ¶¥±-É·Ò,¨ §³¥·¥´´Ò¥´ ¸ ¶¥±É·μ³¥É·¥ …',´¥¸μ¤¥·¦ ²¨Ëμ´μ´´μ£μ ¢±² ¤ ; · §·¥Ï¥´¨¥ ¡Ò²μ §´ Ψɥ²Ó´μ ²ÊÎÏ¥, Î¥³ ¢ ¶·¥¤Ò¤ÊÐ¨Ì Ô±¸ ¶¥·¨³¥´É Ì [13] μ¤´μ¢·¥³¥´´μ ´ ²¨ §¨·μ¢ ²¨¸Ó É·¨É¥³ ¶¥· ÉÊ·Ò, ÎÉμ ¶μ §¢μ²¨²μ ¢±²ÕΨÉÓ ¢ ´ ²¨ § Ô´¥·£¨¨¨¨´É¥´¸¨¢´μ¸É¨¡μ²ÓÏ¥¥ Ψ¸²μ ¶¥·¥Ìμ¤μ¢¸¢μ §¡Ê¦¤¥´-ÒÌ Ê·μ¢´¥°. μ¸²¥¤´¥¥¥ μ¡¸ÉμÖÉ¥²Ó¸É¢μ¸ÊÐ¥¸É¢¥´´μ, É ± ± ± μ¸μ¡¥´´μ¸ÉÓÕ Ì¥³Ò Ê·μ¢´¥°Š ¢ PrAl 3 Ö¢²Ö¥É¸Ö μ¸´μ¢´μ°Ê·μ¢¥´Ó Ÿ¨´£²¥É ƒ 1 ,¸±μ-Éμ·μ£μ ¢μ §³μ¦¥´Éμ²Ó±μ 줨´ ¶¥·¥Ìμ¤´ ¶¥·¢Ò°¢μ §¡Ê¦¤¥´´Ò°Ê·μ¢¥´Ó Å ¤Ê¡²¥É ƒ 6¸Ô´¥ ·£¨¥°4,52 ³Ô‚.…”
Section: ‹ˆ ‡unclassified
“…An energy of 4·5 meV agrees closely with that from other experiments (Alekseev et al . 1982(Alekseev et al . , 1983Andreef et al .…”
Section: Pral 3 Crystal Field Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1978), and the lower energy peak has also been seen before (Andreef et al . 1978;Alekseev et al . 1983).…”
Section: Pral 3 Crystal Field Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%