2004
DOI: 10.2977/prims/1145475492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal Bases for Quantum Classical Algebras and Nakajima’s Monomials

Abstract: Using Nakajima's monomials, we construct a new realization of crystal bases for finite dimensional irreducible modules over quantum classical algebras. We also give an explicit bijection between the monomial realization and the Young tableau realization of crystal bases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our crystal structure described here is probably the same as one in [24] if we use the isomorphism between our B ,0,0 and Kashiwara-Nakashima's tableaux [23] in [15]. Note that the uniqueness of the crystal base of W ( ) was proved in [24].…”
Section: Type B (1) Nmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our crystal structure described here is probably the same as one in [24] if we use the isomorphism between our B ,0,0 and Kashiwara-Nakashima's tableaux [23] in [15]. Note that the uniqueness of the crystal base of W ( ) was proved in [24].…”
Section: Type B (1) Nmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The statement (d) is not explicitly stated in [15], but follows from [15,Prop. 3.2] or the argument below.…”
Section: Preliminary Results For Crystals Of Finite Type D As Is Illumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If i = n − 1 or n, thenf i M is obtained from M by multiplying A n−1 ( j ) −1 or A n ( j ) −1 , and a n−1 ( j ) + a n ( j ) = a n−2 ( j ) (1 ≤ j ≤ n − 2) in M. Note that y n−1 ( j ) = −a n−1 ( j − 1) + a n−2 ( j ) − a n−1 ( j ) = −a n−1 ( j − 1) + a n ( j ), y n ( j ) = −a n ( j − 1) + a n−2 ( j ) − a n ( j ) = −a n ( j − 1) + a n−1 ( j ), and by the definition of the Kashiwara operatorf i , they should be larger than 0. This contradicts condition (5). If i is neither n − 1 nor n, we use the same argument as for the C n type.…”
Section: Proof We Show That M C (∞) Is Closed Under the Kashiwara Opementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, they showed by means of mutually different ways that the connected component C(M) containing a maximal vector M of weight λ ∈ P + is isomorphic to the irreducible highest weight crystal B(λ). For the quantum algebras of type A n , B n , C n , D n , G 2 and A (1) n , Kang and the authors gave an explicit characterization of the Nakajima monomials in C(M) [4,5,12,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%