1972
DOI: 10.1039/p29720002372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal and molecular structure of trans-2,trans-3-dimethylcyclopro-panecarboxylic acid

Abstract: Crystals are monoclinic, space group P2,/c, with Z = 4, in a cell of dimensions : a = 6.39. b = 10.98, c = 9.76 8, p = 105.6". The structure w a s solved by direct phase-determining methods and refined by full-matrix leastsquares calculations to R 0-085 over 638 reflections. The crystals contain centrosymmetric hydrogen-bonded dimers with a conformation in which the C=O bond points over the cyclopropane ring.DURING their investigations on the mechanism of cyclopropane formation from epoxides via the Wittig rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bond lengths and angles are given in Table 1 and can be seen to be similar to those in DBP. The molecular geometry agrees well with that found in t-2,t-3dimethyl-r-1-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid (Luhan & McPhail, 1972). In Fig.…”
Section: ( a ) Experimentalsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The bond lengths and angles are given in Table 1 and can be seen to be similar to those in DBP. The molecular geometry agrees well with that found in t-2,t-3dimethyl-r-1-cyclopropanecarboxylic acid (Luhan & McPhail, 1972). In Fig.…”
Section: ( a ) Experimentalsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The distortion of each of the two geminal dimethyl groups is thus a bending of the whole CMe2 moiety away from the carboxyl group. The average CCC(methyl) angle of the dimethyl acid (120.7°; Luhan & McPhail, 1972) is somewhat larger than expected. This is probably associated with the cis position of the two vicinal methyl groups, but may also be a consequence of crystal packing.…”
Section: • 0{1)mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The most interesting result is that the average ring bond length is 1.520 A, which is about 0.016/~ longer than the average of many structures with carbonyl and carboxyl substituents (1.504 A; Allen, 1980). In the 2,3-dimethyl-substituted acid (Luhan & McPhail, 1972), the average is 1.503 A. The difference between the average adjacent and the opposite ring bonds is 0.037 A in the dimethyl, but 0.048 A in the tetramethyl derivative.…”
Section: 233-tetramethylc Yclopropanecarboxylic Acidmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1.45 (2) C(6)C(7)C(8) 122 (1) C(7)C(8)C(9) 121 (1) C(8)C(9)C(10) 118 (1) C(9)C(10)C(11) 122 (1) C(10)C(11)C(6) 119 (1) C(11)C(6)C (7) 117.7 (9) C(1)C(2)0(12) 117.2 (9) C(3)C (2)0(12) 118.1 (8) C(2)0(12)C(13) 109.9 (8) 0(12)C(13)C(14) 109 (1) 14-13-0(12)-2 178.4 (8) 13-0(12)-2-1 -150.5 (9) 13-0(12)-2-3 -81 (1) 0(12)-2-I-S(4) 6 (1) 2-1-S(4)-5 158.5 (8) 2-3-1-S(4) 111 (1) 3-1-S(4)-6 -160 (1) propane bond, 1.49 (2) A, and the small opposite angle, 58.2(7) °, are common features in cyclopropane compounds such as trans-2,trans-3-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid (Luhan & McPhail, 1972), 1 -chloro-1-phenylsulfonyl-2,3-dimethylcyclopropane (Saenger & Schwalbe, 1971) and methyl 1carbamoylcyclopropane-l-carboxylate (de Jong & Schenk, 1973). The cyclopropane ring and the plane of the phenyl ring make an angle of 23 (2) °.…”
Section: H Hmentioning
confidence: 99%