1980
DOI: 10.1021/ic50209a046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal and molecular structure of [N(CH3)4]2[Mo2O2S2(S2)2]: a compound with two S22- ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance for the sulfidic network found at 2.24 Å, is consistent with a mixture of short distances characteristic of terminal sulfido ligands (typically between 2.09 and 2.19 Å depending on the Mo oxidation state) and long distances around 2.28–2.35 Å associated to bridging sulfido ligands as encountered in (Mo 2 O 2 S 6 ) 2– moiety . In the case of sulfido bridging ligands, the mean Mo–Mo distance is found at 2.82 Å which is slightly longer than our refined Comp.2 distance (2.78 Å). We ascribe that the additional bridging by disulfido ligand of both Mo could be responsible for the Mo–Mo distance shortening.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distance for the sulfidic network found at 2.24 Å, is consistent with a mixture of short distances characteristic of terminal sulfido ligands (typically between 2.09 and 2.19 Å depending on the Mo oxidation state) and long distances around 2.28–2.35 Å associated to bridging sulfido ligands as encountered in (Mo 2 O 2 S 6 ) 2– moiety . In the case of sulfido bridging ligands, the mean Mo–Mo distance is found at 2.82 Å which is slightly longer than our refined Comp.2 distance (2.78 Å). We ascribe that the additional bridging by disulfido ligand of both Mo could be responsible for the Mo–Mo distance shortening.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The refined parameters for the oxidic network are fully consistent with Mo–ligand distances found in known hexavalent Mo-based compounds like (NH 4 ) 2 Mo 7 O 24 .4H 2 O with MoO t bond at 1.66 Å and oxo bridging ligand at 1.74 Å giving rise to Mo-Al and Mo-Mo distances at 3.06 and 3.42 Å. The distance for the sulfidic network found at 2.24 Å, is consistent with a mixture of short distances characteristic of terminal sulfido ligands (typically between 2.09 and 2.19 Å depending on the Mo oxidation state) and long distances around 2.28–2.35 Å associated to bridging sulfido ligands as encountered in (Mo 2 O 2 S 6 ) 2– moiety . In the case of sulfido bridging ligands, the mean Mo–Mo distance is found at 2.82 Å which is slightly longer than our refined Comp.2 distance (2.78 Å).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The neutral-atom scattering factors were calculated from the analytical expression for the scattering factor curves. 16 The/'and/"components of anomalous dispersion were those of Cromer and Liberman17 and were included in the calculations for the Ru and P atoms. The agreement residuals are defined as R^= (|| 0| -|FC||)/2}|F0| and Ri…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mo(1)–Mo(2) bond distance is 2.8285(5) Å, or similar to those seen for [Mo 2 O 2 (μ-S) 2 (cys) 2 ] 2– and [Mo 2 O 2 (μ-S) 2 (citrate) 2 ] 6– . The dihedral angle of the [Mo 2 O 2 (μ-S) 2 ] 2+ core was calculated as 173°, or quite a bit wider than those in [Mo 2 O 2 (μ-S) 2 (DMF) 6 ]­(I) 2 , [Mo 2 O 2 (μ-S) 2 (S 2 )­(DMF) 3 ], and (Me 4 N) 2 [Mo 2 O 2 (μ-S) 2 (S 2 ) 2 ] that fall between 150° and 160°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%