1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(89)80095-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptosporidiosis in Great Yarmouth — the investigation of an outbreak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Person-person transmission has been documented for Cryptosporidium (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). For the Milwaukee outbreak, it was estimated that 5 percent of the outbreak cases were due to within-household transmission (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Person-person transmission has been documented for Cryptosporidium (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). For the Milwaukee outbreak, it was estimated that 5 percent of the outbreak cases were due to within-household transmission (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising and is biologically plausible considering the route of transmission. Furthermore, it is well recognized as a source of secondary transmission according to previous research [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, zoonotic transmission cannot explain the large number of infections reported from persons living and working in urban areas where exposure to animal feces is minimal. Present evidence indicates that person-to-person transmission of cryptosporidiosis is common (3,30,45,94,217,237,341). In 1983, an accidental laboratory infection demonstrated that a human isolate of C. parvum could be transmitted from one person to another (33).…”
Section: Sources Of Human Infectionmentioning
confidence: 93%