2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptomelane: A tool to determine the age and the physical–chemical regime of a Plio-Pleistocene weathering zone in a granitic terrain (Hagendorf, SE Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one deposit of cryptomelane, a direct comparison has been conducted and yielded an age of formation of 4.20 ± 0.33 Ma for cryptomelane while torbernite gave an age of 4.55 ± 0.02 Ma. Thereby they furnish convincing evidence to belong to the same Pliocene groundwater system and cast in to the role of environment markers [48,49].…”
Section: Composition and Age Of Formation Of The Mineral Association Of The Supergene Alterationmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one deposit of cryptomelane, a direct comparison has been conducted and yielded an age of formation of 4.20 ± 0.33 Ma for cryptomelane while torbernite gave an age of 4.55 ± 0.02 Ma. Thereby they furnish convincing evidence to belong to the same Pliocene groundwater system and cast in to the role of environment markers [48,49].…”
Section: Composition and Age Of Formation Of The Mineral Association Of The Supergene Alterationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Both methods do not cover the period of time from the late Pleistocene through the Neogene relevant for the current investigation. Therefore, only the classical U/Pb and K/Ar or Ar/Ar age dating methods appropriate for K-bearing manganese oxide-hydrate and uriniferous silicates and phosphates can successfully been used [47][48][49][50]. In a few places where syngenetic organic matter has been identified in Neogene sediments palynology may be useful [51].…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging techniques that allow dating of minerals formed above and below the redox front allow the residence times of the minerals and the depth of post-formational erosion to be estimated. For example, age estimates can be derived from meteoric 10 Be inventories in saprolites (Ebert et al 2012; Duxbury et al 2015), K–Ar dating of authigenic illite soil clays (Fredin et al 2017) and Mn oxides (Dill et al 2010b) and high-resolution mass spectrometry of U phosphates and silicates (Dill et al 2010a). In zones of low glacial erosion, cosmogenic nuclide inventories from depth profiles in quarries and tor interiors (Bierman & Caffee 2002), on quartz veins in MTD (Portenga et al 2013) and on dissected, till-covered shore platforms (Saillard et al 2009) also have potential for establishing erosion rates across a variety of geomorphological settings.…”
Section: Conclusion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons with thick and clay-rich Pliocene palaeosols developed elsewhere in the Arctic (Glushkova and Smirnov, 2007) suggest that the weathering crusts in northern Finland probably represent younger weathering events. Future dating of supergene Mn minerals (Dill et al, 2010b) may provide a test of whether or not the thin weathering crusts represent types of early or middle Pleistocene palaeosols.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Late Neogene Weathering Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cosmogenic isotopes from weathering profiles and tills can constrain weathering age and depths of shield erosion (Matmon et al, 2003;Ebert et al, 2012b;Refsnider and Miller, 2013). The penetration in fracture zones of supergene mineralisation to depths of N100 m in shield rocks (Drake et al, 2009) also provides opportunities to date weathering episodes and to better constrain denudation rates over 1-10 My time frames (Dill et al, 2010a(Dill et al, , 2010b. Improved dating of saprolites and secondary minerals is a key step for further constraining timescales for the development of large scale shield geomorphology.…”
Section: Implications For Glaciation Of Northern Shieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%