2019
DOI: 10.21684/2412-2343-2019-6-1-63-81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptocurrency regulation in the BriCs Countries and the eurasian economic union

Abstract: This article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the legislative approaches to the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the BRICS countries and the Eurasian Economic Union. During the analysis, regulatory legal acts and draft laws, including material on judicial practice, of the Russian Federation, China, India, Brazil, the Republic of South Africa, the Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia were studied. The use of a comparative-legal method makes it possible to develop recommendat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though it is difficult to have outright total control of a borderless digital currency (Sushko and Kaznin, 2019), in some African countries digital currency innovations are legally restricted (Thomson Reuters, 2017). However, the South African financial market as one of the most advanced in Africa took a laisser-faire approach to cryptocurrency transactions by allowing the market to trade at own risk as there is no substantive regulatory framework yet (SARB, 2014; Chudinovskikh and Sevryugin, 2019). The resilience and adaptive of the South African financial market makes it more liberal from a regulatory perspective as it continues to look for a policy position to fully embrace cryptocurrency (IFWG, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though it is difficult to have outright total control of a borderless digital currency (Sushko and Kaznin, 2019), in some African countries digital currency innovations are legally restricted (Thomson Reuters, 2017). However, the South African financial market as one of the most advanced in Africa took a laisser-faire approach to cryptocurrency transactions by allowing the market to trade at own risk as there is no substantive regulatory framework yet (SARB, 2014; Chudinovskikh and Sevryugin, 2019). The resilience and adaptive of the South African financial market makes it more liberal from a regulatory perspective as it continues to look for a policy position to fully embrace cryptocurrency (IFWG, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very important that there is a unified European or global definition of virtual currencies and cryptocurrencies. In many countries, the legal framework for cryptocurrencies is not considered at all and needs to be developed [23]. Cryptocurrencies are gaining significant popularity due to the benefits of their use, such as convenience, independence, accessibility, lack of commitment, confidentiality, no documents, full accounting automation, and optimization of administrative costs [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of legal approaches to the discussed issues in contemporary legal systems. 141 For instance, ICOs are banned in China and South Korea. 142 In most countries, traditional financial 143 and civil 144 regulations are applicable to issues regarding cryptocurrencies.…”
Section: General Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%