1937
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1937.01980010090008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptococcic Bronchopneumonia

Abstract: CHICAGOCases are occasionally observed in the routine practice of the physician which are typical from the clinical standpoint but in which the laboratory findings are distinctly novel. Such cases are probably more frequent than a perusal of the medical literature would indicate, and they are therefore worth reporting.The following is a report, with laboratory findings, of a case in which the condition appeared clinically to be bronchopneumonia but in which Cryptococcus was isolated and none of the well known … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1941
1941
1941
1941

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was nonpathogenic for rabbits. Black and Fisher (1937) reported isolating this yeast (in large numbers) from the nasopharynx of a boy suffering from bronchopneumonia; the cultures were made to obtain pneumococci for typing, since no sputum was obtained. Their strain did not kill rats, but produced lesions in the omentum from which the yeast was reisolated.…”
Section: The Genus Brettanomycesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was nonpathogenic for rabbits. Black and Fisher (1937) reported isolating this yeast (in large numbers) from the nasopharynx of a boy suffering from bronchopneumonia; the cultures were made to obtain pneumococci for typing, since no sputum was obtained. Their strain did not kill rats, but produced lesions in the omentum from which the yeast was reisolated.…”
Section: The Genus Brettanomycesmentioning
confidence: 99%