1997
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.34.8.640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptic terminal rearrangement of chromosome 22q13.32 detected by FISH in two unrelated patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
58
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cryptic deletions of 22q13.3 resulting from malsegregation of maternal translocations were reported by Smith et al [1996] and Doheny et al [1997]. Doheny et al [1997] also reported a de novo cryptic deletion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cryptic deletions of 22q13.3 resulting from malsegregation of maternal translocations were reported by Smith et al [1996] and Doheny et al [1997]. Doheny et al [1997] also reported a de novo cryptic deletion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Doheny et al [1997] also reported a de novo cryptic deletion. Yong et al [1997] reported the first case of mosaicism for deletion 22q13.2 in a 5-year-old female with global developmental delay, failure to thrive, seizures, dysmorphic features, and abnormal skin pigmentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are currently insufficient published reports of the use of this technology in the evaluation of the child with DD/MR. At the time of [76][77][78][79] this writing, a few clinical laboratories are offering this type of testing.…”
Section: Submicroscopic Subtelomeric Rearrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breakpoint involving loss of short arm material is of no clinical consequence, whereas breakpoint on the long arm, which can vary in size, can affect the phenotypic expression dependent on the size of the deletion. Manifestations of 22q telomere deletions include developmental delay, normal or accelerated growth, hypotonia, delay or absence of speech, and minor facial anomalies [Doheny et al, 1997;Nesslinger et al, 1994;Schroder et al, 1998], which is similar to the phenotype reported for ring 22 [Hunter et al, 1977].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%