2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptic sulfur cycling during the formation of giant gypsum deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible that a large proportion of reduced sulfur was rapidly reoxidized within the same environmental setting without significantly affecting the δ 34 S record. Such a “cryptic sulfur cycle” has been described from TRS-poor gypsum deposits of Messinian age whose δ 34 S tracks the composition of contemporaneous seawater . Local variability in the degree of sulfide formation and reoxidation may contribute to the variability observed in δ 34 S CAS and δ 34 S TRS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also possible that a large proportion of reduced sulfur was rapidly reoxidized within the same environmental setting without significantly affecting the δ 34 S record. Such a “cryptic sulfur cycle” has been described from TRS-poor gypsum deposits of Messinian age whose δ 34 S tracks the composition of contemporaneous seawater . Local variability in the degree of sulfide formation and reoxidation may contribute to the variability observed in δ 34 S CAS and δ 34 S TRS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such a “cryptic sulfur cycle” has been described from TRS-poor gypsum deposits of Messinian age whose δ 34 S tracks the composition of contemporaneous seawater. 39 Local variability in the degree of sulfide formation and reoxidation may contribute to the variability observed in δ 34 S CAS and δ 34 S TRS . In any case, our results differ from modern sulfate-poor lakes (0.1–0.35 mM), where sulfide in sediments trends toward the isotopic composition of the available sulfate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local conditions such as high river inflow might have prevented gypsum formation by locally reducing the salinity (e.g., Ebro delta in the VB; Figure 7). Other local geo‐chemical and geo‐biological factors might have also prevented the formation of gypsum locally in deep basin context (e.g., reduced supply of gypsum from the water column and higher rates of bacterial sulphate reduction, deriving from permanent seafloor anoxia and larger availability of organic matter; Guibourdenche et al, 2022; Natalicchio et al, 2021). In shallow water where freshwater dilution did not play a role, the absence of PLG must mean that it has been removed after deposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use this age model to integrate new and published and strontium isotope data to reconstruct the paleoenvironmental and paleohydrological evolution of the Adriatic during the final phase of the MSC. We conclude that somewhere between 5.59 and 5.55 Ma, which corresponds to the nadir of the MSC when the Mediterranean water level was probably at its lowest and halite precipitated in its deepest basins, the Adriatic ; (2, 3) Natalicchio et al ( , 2021; (4) Guibourdenche et al, 2022;(5) Lugli et al, 2010;(6) Natalicchio et al ( 2019); ( 7) Sabino et al (2021); ( 8) Aloisi et al (2022); ( 9) Krijgsman et al (2018);(10) Roveri et al (2014a);(11) Amadori et al (2018);(12) Roveri et al (2008a);(13) Cazzini et al (2020); ( 14) Andreetto et al (2022a);(15) Micallef et al (2018); ( 16) Garcia-Castellanos et al (2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…5.1c), also known as Gessoso-Solfifera Fm. This unit comprises a gypsum member precipitated in shallow piggy-back basins, and a gypsum-free, euxinic shales member deposited in deeper, suboxic to anoxic settings (Lugli et al, 2010;Dela Pierre et al, 2011;Guibourdenche et al, 2022). The sediments of the Gessoso-Solfifera Fm.…”
Section: The Sedimentary Record Of the Adriatic Megalakementioning
confidence: 99%