2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2006.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptic species and systematics of the hynobiid salamanders of the Liua–Pseudohynobius complex: Molecular and phylogenetic perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…kuankuoshuiensis (Xu et al, 2007), Ps. shuichengensis (Tian et al, 2006), and Ps. tsinpaensis (Hu et al, 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…kuankuoshuiensis (Xu et al, 2007), Ps. shuichengensis (Tian et al, 2006), and Ps. tsinpaensis (Hu et al, 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cyt b was used by Li et al (2010) to study five species of Pseudohynobius system development. Zeng et al (2006) suggested that Ps. tsinpaensis should be called Liua tsinpaensis, based on a phylogenetic study of the Liua-Pseudohynobius complex using cyt b only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the molecular phylogeny supports the validity of the genus Pseudohynobius and the species P. flavomaculatus (Li et showed that the distribution of P. flavomaculatus includes Nanchuan (Chongqing), Suiyang (Guizhou), Lichuan (Hubei), and Sangzhi (Hunan). Zeng et al (2006) suggested that the Nanchuan and Suiyang populations are two cryptic species based on the molecular data, and these two cryptic species were described by Xu et al (2007) and Wei et al (2009), respectively. In addition to the above listed 73 specimens, 110 other specimens were recorded and preserved as P. flavomaculatus, but the original records of them are missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Comments: Previously, P. jinfo was considered as a population of P. flavomaculatus (Fei et al, 2006), Zeng et al (2006) suggested it is a cryptic species based on the molecular data, and Wei et al (2009) Huang et al (1992) and Fei et al (2006) considered that the diagnosis of the genus Liua cannot effectively distinguish the genus Liua from the genus Ranodon, so the genus Liua was not valid, and R. shihi should be assigned in the genus Ranodon. However, the molecular data supports the validity of the genus Liua (Li et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2005;Zeng et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2006;Xia et al, 2012). In addition to the listed 699 specimens of L. shihi, whose populations are affirmed by molecular data, 52 other specimens have (Liu and Hu, 1966).…”
Section: Asian Herpetological Research 330mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation