2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2022.102304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptic speciation of benthic Prorocentrum (Dinophyceae) species and their potential as ecological indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is indicative that size range cannot be used to distinguish between these closely related species. In this study, the phylogenetic analyses of LSU rDNA (D1⁄D2) regions showed the intermixing of strains reported under Prorocentrum fukuyoi, Prorocentrum emarginatum, and Prorocentrum emarginatum/fukuyoi and recovered four clades in agreement with Wu et al [39]. Our result indicated that ISOP40 fell within the clade from the type material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is indicative that size range cannot be used to distinguish between these closely related species. In this study, the phylogenetic analyses of LSU rDNA (D1⁄D2) regions showed the intermixing of strains reported under Prorocentrum fukuyoi, Prorocentrum emarginatum, and Prorocentrum emarginatum/fukuyoi and recovered four clades in agreement with Wu et al [39]. Our result indicated that ISOP40 fell within the clade from the type material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%