2021
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptic burrow traces in black shales – a petrographic Rorschach test or the real thing?

Abstract: In black shale studies, apparent lack of bioturbation is commonly taken as an indication of anoxic bottom waters. Yet, modern oxygen-stressed environments show that even at suboxic levels (0.0 to 0.2 ml l À1 oxygen), microscopic eukaryotic benthic organisms live in the uppermost millimetres to centimetres of the substrate. Known as meiofauna, these organisms disturb the primary fabric as they move through the sediment. These modern examples inspired students of the rock record to report sub-millimetre irregula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biogenic structures in fine-grained deposits are notoriously difficult to identify and classify (see Schieber et al 2021). Also, identifying trace fossils in core presents its own challenges (see Pemberton et al 2001).…”
Section: Remarks On the Classification Of Trace Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biogenic structures in fine-grained deposits are notoriously difficult to identify and classify (see Schieber et al 2021). Also, identifying trace fossils in core presents its own challenges (see Pemberton et al 2001).…”
Section: Remarks On the Classification Of Trace Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If raw images were given to, say, ten individuals with a set of instructions on how to mark particles, we are confident that there would be ten different versions of particle arrangements. When in search for patterns, humans invariably ‘find a way’ (Schieber et al ., 2021), but whether such perceived patterns have a basis in reality begs serious scrutiny. As detailed below, from our understanding of mud‐aggregate generation, transport, deposition and burial, the particles as marked by Al‐Mufti (2022) cannot be considered intraclastic aggregates.…”
Section: Floccules Intraclasts or Artefacts (Reply To Comment 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%