2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00145-005-0129-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptanalysis of Skipjack Reduced to 31 Rounds Using Impossible Differentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
270
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
270
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…is high enough (or zero [3]). The common assumption is that this probability is quite uniform over all keys and plaintexts.…”
Section: Related-key Boomerang and Rectangle Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is high enough (or zero [3]). The common assumption is that this probability is quite uniform over all keys and plaintexts.…”
Section: Related-key Boomerang and Rectangle Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, as (z, 0) → (z, 0) we get a related-key impossible differential (due to the miss in the middle attack [3,2]). …”
Section: Related-key Boomerang Distinguisher For Coconut98mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2002, Moon et al [19] presented an impossible differential [2,14] attack on 14 rounds of XTEA. In 2003, Hong et al [6] presented a differential [5] attack on 15 rounds of XTEA and a truncated differential [13] attack on 23 rounds of XTEA, where the former attack is due to a 13-round differential with probability 2 −54.795 and the latter attack is due to a 8-round truncated differential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is high enough (or zero [5]). A related-key differential is a triplet of a plaintext difference ∆P , a ciphertext difference ∆C, and a key difference ∆K, such that…”
Section: Related-key Differentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%