2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CryoSat: A mission to determine the fluctuations in Earth’s land and marine ice fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
532
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(564 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
532
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The radar altimeter on board Envisat has a much coarser resolution and lower data coverage than the one on board CS-2. Due to the delay/Doppler processing, the CS-2 footprint corresponds to the size of a Doppler cell, which is approximately 300 × 1600 m (Wingham et al, 2006), while Envisat has a footprint of 2-10 km (Connor et al, 2009). Envisat waveforms from mixed surfaces are often discarded since they do not match the classification scheme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radar altimeter on board Envisat has a much coarser resolution and lower data coverage than the one on board CS-2. Due to the delay/Doppler processing, the CS-2 footprint corresponds to the size of a Doppler cell, which is approximately 300 × 1600 m (Wingham et al, 2006), while Envisat has a footprint of 2-10 km (Connor et al, 2009). Envisat waveforms from mixed surfaces are often discarded since they do not match the classification scheme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIRAL altimeter is able to operate in three different modes: Low Resolution mode, SAR mode and SAR Interferometic (SARIn) mode [19]. Over rugged terrains (such as high Asia), SIRAL is operating in SARIn mode.…”
Section: Cryosat-2 Altimetry Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical and atmospheric corrections are used to correct altimeter measurements from different perturbations due to the environment and ensure the highest precision output data. We used Level-2 SIRAL SARIn mode data over Tibetan lakes [19], which include each month of the period July 2010 to April 2014.…”
Section: Cryosat-2 Altimetry Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal challenges in deriving an accurate sea ice thickness using satellite altimetry are the discrimination of ice and open water, retracking radar waveforms to obtain height estimates, constructing sea surface height beneath the ice, and estimating the depth of the snow 20 cover. Ice thickness is retrieved from freeboard by processing CS2 Level 1B data, with a footprint of approximately 300 m by 1700 m (Wingham et al, 2006), and assuming snow density and snow depth from the Warren et al (1999) climatology (hereafter W99), modified for the distribution of multi-year versus first-year ice (see Laxon et al, 2013 andTilling et al, 2018 for data processing details).…”
Section: Ice Thickness Distribution From Cryosat-2mentioning
confidence: 99%