2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of in vitro produced bovine embryos: effects of lipid segregation and post-thaw laser assisted hatching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Although this method allows a good estimate of living and dead cells in the embryo, since dead cells are permeable to PI and living cells are stained by the Hoechst [8], an underestimation of dead cells may occur if they are surrounded by living cells [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Although this method allows a good estimate of living and dead cells in the embryo, since dead cells are permeable to PI and living cells are stained by the Hoechst [8], an underestimation of dead cells may occur if they are surrounded by living cells [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An embryo's capacity to survive cryopreservation depends on several factors, including species, stage of development, origin (in vivo or in vitro), cryopreservation methodology, cryoprotectant [5], and intracytoplasmic lipid content [6]. Post-thaw viability can be estimated with the blastocoel reexpansion rate, embryonic cleavage rate, in vitro hatching [7,8], as well as with fluorescent probes (e.g., Hoechst 33 342 and propidium iodide), which stain living and dead cells, respectively, and are useful to estimate the percentage of viable blastomeres [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have tried to evaluate the effect of approaches such as increasing the cooling and re-warming speed with super-cooled nitrogen (WERLICH et al, 2006), use of cytoskeletal stabilizers (PRYOR et al, 2011), and use of different cryoprotectant combinations and reduced volumes of cryopreservation solution (TANIGUCHI et al, 2007;RIOS et al, 2010). Unfortunately, so far, none of the proposed strategies consistently improved the viability of bovine cryopreserved IVP embryos to the levels observed for in vivo-generated embryos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro-produced (IVP) embryos are more sensitive to cryopreservation than their in vivoderived counterparts (LEIBO; LOSKUTOFF, 1993;PRYOR et al, 2011). IVP embryos differ from the in vivo-produced embryos in many aspects, including lower buoyant density (POLLARD; LEIBO, 1994), incomplete compaction (WOLFE; BRYANT, 1999), darker cytoplasm (DIEZ et al, 2001), and increased lipid levels (CROSIER et al, 2000;FAIR et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the early days of IVF, it was obvious that in-vitromatured oocytes and in-vitro-produced embryos looked and behaved differently. For example, several studies show that in-vitro-produced embryos are less competent to implant and more sensitive to cryopreservation compared to in-vivo-produced embryos (Pryor et al 2011). With the development of genomic tools, the capacity to analyse embryos from the one-cell to blastocyst stage provided a new angle to compare in vivo and in vitro aspects.…”
Section: The Genomic Effect (2010-2020)mentioning
confidence: 99%