2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02834-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of human semen and prepared sperm: effects on motility parameters and DNA integrity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
157
0
12

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
19
157
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of cryopreservation on the integrity of the sperm nucleus are not well characterized. It is reported that the cryopreservation process of freezing and thawing can increase inappropriate chromatin condensation in human (Royere et al 1988, Royere et al 1991, Donnelly et al 2001, Hammadeh et al 2001, boar (Fraser & Strzezek 2004), horse (Linfor & Meyers 2002), and ram (Peris at al. 2004) sperm.…”
Section: Effects Of Cryopreservation On Sperm Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effects of cryopreservation on the integrity of the sperm nucleus are not well characterized. It is reported that the cryopreservation process of freezing and thawing can increase inappropriate chromatin condensation in human (Royere et al 1988, Royere et al 1991, Donnelly et al 2001, Hammadeh et al 2001, boar (Fraser & Strzezek 2004), horse (Linfor & Meyers 2002), and ram (Peris at al. 2004) sperm.…”
Section: Effects Of Cryopreservation On Sperm Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant correlation between the presence of nuclear DNA alterations in mature spermatozoa and poor sperm parameters or impaired reproductive efficiency is reported in both humans and animals (Ron-el et al 1991, Hughes et al 1996, Edwards & Beard 1999. To date, studies show that the cryopreservation process causes DNA damage to mammalian sperm in human (Royere et al 1988, 1991, Donnelly et al 2001, Hammadeh et al 2001, boar (Fraser & Strzezek 2004), and ram (Peris et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, no sensitive highly quantitative method has been used to examine the relationship between subject's age and sperm DNA damage. Methods such as filter elution assays (19 -21), terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) (22), comet assay, or microgel electrophoresis technique (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) have been used to quantify DNA damage in sperm cells. The neutral microgel electrophoresis technique is a sensitive and simple method of evaluating double-strand break DNA damage in individual sperm cells (24,(33)(34)(35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryopreservation leads to increases in chromatin instability and single-strand DNA fragmentation [8][9][10]. Although not investigated in the current analysis, the recent literature on sperm DNA fragmentation have consistently demonstrated that the degree of fragmentation strongly correlates with spermatozoa parameters such as concentration, motility, and morphology with correlation coefficients as high as 0.50 [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although not investigated in the current analysis, the recent literature on sperm DNA fragmentation have consistently demonstrated that the degree of fragmentation strongly correlates with spermatozoa parameters such as concentration, motility, and morphology with correlation coefficients as high as 0.50 [11][12][13][14][15]. Hence it is possible that the postprocessing spermatozoa motility may be an index of cryoinjury and DNA fragmentation [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%