2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10561-005-1969-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of Human Oocytes and Ovarian Tissue

Abstract: Oocyte cryopreservation has the potential to be an important adjunct to assisted reproductive technologies and bypasses some ethical, moral, and religious dilemmas posed by human embryo cryopreservation. The success of human oocyte cryopreservation depends on morphological and biophysical factors that could influence oocyte survival after thawing. Among the morphological factors, the maturity, quality, size of the oocyte, the presence or the absence of the cumulus oophorus seems to play an important role in oo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
31
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies have reported better human MII oocyte survival if the cumulus was removed prior to freezing (Gook et al 1993) and, since prior cumulus removal allows better evaluation of oocyte quality ( Fabbri 2006) and any detrimental effects of removing the cumulus on subsequent zona penetrability are circumvented by using intracytoplasmic sperm injection rather than conventional IVF to achieve fertilisation, cumulus removal prior to cryopreservation is now a standard practice during cryopreservation of MII human oocytes. Moreover, recent clinical studies have produced very promising results in terms of percentages of injected oocytes developing to the blastocyst stage or resulting in ongoing pregnancies (Cobo et al 2008, Cao et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies have reported better human MII oocyte survival if the cumulus was removed prior to freezing (Gook et al 1993) and, since prior cumulus removal allows better evaluation of oocyte quality ( Fabbri 2006) and any detrimental effects of removing the cumulus on subsequent zona penetrability are circumvented by using intracytoplasmic sperm injection rather than conventional IVF to achieve fertilisation, cumulus removal prior to cryopreservation is now a standard practice during cryopreservation of MII human oocytes. Moreover, recent clinical studies have produced very promising results in terms of percentages of injected oocytes developing to the blastocyst stage or resulting in ongoing pregnancies (Cobo et al 2008, Cao et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logo após a desocngelação, é necessária a remoção do ACP, que pode ser realizada através de uma ou várias lavagens do material criopreservado (Santos et al, 2008); comumente realiza-se três lavagens, com duração entre 5 a 15 minutos cada uma. O procedimento de remoção do crioprotetor é um fator que pode afetar a sobrevivência celular pós descongelação, uma vez que ao expor a célula com alta concentração de ACP a um meio com concentração deste agente baixa ou nula, a água tende a penetrar rapidamente na célula, causando aumento de volume ou até mesmo rompimento celular (Fabbri, 2006).…”
Section: Congelação Lentaunclassified
“…33,42,48,61 However, the outcome of oocyte cryopreservation has been largely dismal so far. 13,17,18,37,39,52 The two major biophysical events that may result in damage to oocytes during cryopreservation is the formation of a significant amount of ice inside the cells (intracellular ice formation or IIF) and excessive cell dehydration as a result of water transport out of the cells. 47,56 Conventionally, oocyte cryopreservation was done by the so-called slow-freezing approach which relies on the use of an optimal slow cooling rate (usually <2°C/min) to dehydrate the cells so that IIF can be minimized while, at the same time, without incurring significant cell damage by excessive cell dehydration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%