2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of boar semen and its future importance to the industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
74
2
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
74
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps, both are good general measures of the function of the cell surface and, for that reason, only one of these apparently redundant attributes was necessary in the model to predict fertility. Although there is less information on the effect of cryopreservation on sperm binding to the zona pellucida, it is known that cryopreservation induces precocious capacitation of boar spermatozoa and/or acrosome damage (Bailey et al, 2008) and reduces the ability of spermatozoa to bind oviduct epithelial cells (Lefebvre & Suarez, 1996;Fazeli et al, 1999). This reduction is probably because premature capacitation and acrosomal damage can reduce oviduct cell and zona pellucida binding (Ivanova & Mollova, 1993;Bailey et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Perhaps, both are good general measures of the function of the cell surface and, for that reason, only one of these apparently redundant attributes was necessary in the model to predict fertility. Although there is less information on the effect of cryopreservation on sperm binding to the zona pellucida, it is known that cryopreservation induces precocious capacitation of boar spermatozoa and/or acrosome damage (Bailey et al, 2008) and reduces the ability of spermatozoa to bind oviduct epithelial cells (Lefebvre & Suarez, 1996;Fazeli et al, 1999). This reduction is probably because premature capacitation and acrosomal damage can reduce oviduct cell and zona pellucida binding (Ivanova & Mollova, 1993;Bailey et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is less information on the effect of cryopreservation on sperm binding to the zona pellucida, it is known that cryopreservation induces precocious capacitation of boar spermatozoa and/or acrosome damage (Bailey et al, 2008) and reduces the ability of spermatozoa to bind oviduct epithelial cells (Lefebvre & Suarez, 1996;Fazeli et al, 1999). This reduction is probably because premature capacitation and acrosomal damage can reduce oviduct cell and zona pellucida binding (Ivanova & Mollova, 1993;Bailey et al, 2008). The final model included an inverse relationship between the percentage of acrosome-compromised spermatozoa after 30 min (T30) and percentage of piglets sired by a specific boar (Table 1) but, in contrast, a positive relationship between acrosome-compromised spermatozoa at T0 and fertility (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Iulian IBĂNESCU 1,2* , Petru ROŞCA 1 , Ioana CRIVEI 1 preservation in boar, maintaining higher sperm fertility compared with freezing method (Hu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Correlations Between Some Parameters Of Raw and Stored Semenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that cryopreservation of semen allows both the storage of genetic material for a long time, and the introduction of desired traits to the currently run breeding lines (Johnson et al 2000, Gerrits et al 2005, Bailey et al 2008). In addition, it contributes to the prevention of possible biological hazards in the production of high quality pork, and allows the reproduction of parents' genetic traits eliminated during an epidemic (Bailey et al 2008, Didion et al 2013. Therefore, in this aspect, cryopreservation of semen is of great significance in the long-term storage of genetic material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%