1996
DOI: 10.1006/cryo.1996.0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of Anchorage-Dependent Mammalian Cells Fixed to Structured Glass and Silicon Substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These facts suggest that heat and mass transfer within the porous scaffold were sufficient in this study. It has been reported that 60–75% of viable cells were recovered after thawing cryopreserved fibroblasts that were attached to a glass chip, a silicon chip, or a polyglycolic acid scaffold (9,18). Compared with these results, a similar or slightly higher recovery rate was obtained in the present study (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These facts suggest that heat and mass transfer within the porous scaffold were sufficient in this study. It has been reported that 60–75% of viable cells were recovered after thawing cryopreserved fibroblasts that were attached to a glass chip, a silicon chip, or a polyglycolic acid scaffold (9,18). Compared with these results, a similar or slightly higher recovery rate was obtained in the present study (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Almost all previous investigations of the effect of cell-cell interactions on the IIF process have compared freshly trypsinized cells in suspension, or single cells adherent to glass, with cells of the same type cultured in confluent monolayers on glass (e.g., Porsche et al, 1991;Armitage and Juss, 1996;Acker and McGann, 2000), or suspension cultured in aggregates (e.g., McGann et al, 1972;McGrath et al, 1975;Acker et al, 1999). However, previous experimental designs have been unable to control confounding effects resulting from cell damage by enzymatic digestion (McGann et al, 1972;Sandler and Andersson, 1984;Yarmush et al, 1992), from changes in phenotype due to time in culture (Hetzel et al, 1973;Darr and Hubel, 2001) or cell attachment and spreading (Hornung et al, 1996;Chen et al, 1997), or from mass transport limitations in cell clusters (Levin et al, 1977). Whereas all aforementioned factors affect IIF and cryoinjury, past attempts to attribute differences in probability of IIF or cell survival for different culture configuration to hypothesized effects of cell-cell contact have not been conclusive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although such observations are suggestive of a role for cell-cell interactions in mediating IIF in tissue, these studies have introduced a host of confounding factors by comparing freshly trypsinized cells with cells cultured for various lengths of time in different configurations. To whit, the probability of IIF is known to be affected both by trypsinization (Sandler and Andersson, 1984;Yarmush et al, 1992) and time in culture (Hetzel et al, 1973;Hornung et al, 1996;Darr and Hubel, 2001); in cell clusters, mass transport limitations may also affect IIF (Levin et al, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different cryopreservation methodologies alternative to the commonly applied protocols are reported in the literature; some refer to the use of structured substrates, 15 cell 1 Animal Cell Technology, IBET=ITQB-UNL, Oeiras, Portugal. 2 Kryobiophysik & Kryotechnologie, Fraunhofer-IBMT, Ingbert, Germany.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%