2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cry1Ac Transgenic Sugarcane Does Not Affect the Diversity of Microbial Communities and Has No Significant Effect on Enzyme Activities in Rhizosphere Soil within One Crop Season

Abstract: Cry1Ac transgenic sugarcane provides a promising way to control stem-borer pests. Biosafety assessment of soil ecosystem for cry1Ac transgenic sugarcane is urgently needed because of the important role of soil microorganisms in nutrient transformations and element cycling, however little is known. This study aimed to explore the potential impact of cry1Ac transgenic sugarcane on rhizosphere soil enzyme activities and microbial community diversity, and also to investigate whether the gene flow occurs through ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences were observed in abundance of phyla between CC and TC-10 except for TC-15mix ( Figure 1 ). Our results were consistent with the previous publications, suggesting that monoculture of one transgenic cotton line may have no effect on fungal phylum composition in comparison with conventional cotton ( Griffiths et al, 2000 ; Koch et al, 2015 ; Zhou et al, 2016 ). However, a remarkable difference was observed between TC-15mix and groups of CC and TC-10 at phylum level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…No significant differences were observed in abundance of phyla between CC and TC-10 except for TC-15mix ( Figure 1 ). Our results were consistent with the previous publications, suggesting that monoculture of one transgenic cotton line may have no effect on fungal phylum composition in comparison with conventional cotton ( Griffiths et al, 2000 ; Koch et al, 2015 ; Zhou et al, 2016 ). However, a remarkable difference was observed between TC-15mix and groups of CC and TC-10 at phylum level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, Bt cotton cultivation did not affect microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil [14] and the community characteristics of rhizosphere soil nematodes [13]. And Cry1Ac transgenic sugarcane would not change the diversity of microbial communities or modify enzyme activities in rhizosphere soil within one crop season [45]. Bt rice also had no persistent or adverse effect on the microbial community composition in its rhizosphere [12, 29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fieldcultivated Bt transgenic cotton has also been found to have no signi cant effect on rhizosphere communities compared with WT cotton [74]. Similarly, Cry1Ac-sugarcane was found to have no impact on rhizosphere microbial diversity or enzyme activity compared with NT sugarcane within a single crop season [75]. In addition, no persistent or adverse effects on the rhizosphere bacterial community population were detected between WT and Bt-modi ed rice [76].…”
Section: Effects Of Cry1ah1 Expression On Native Rhizosphere Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 93%