1998
DOI: 10.1029/1998gl900149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal transition between continental and oceanic domains along the North Iberian Margin from wide angle seismic and gravity data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
107
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) can be interpreted as a true accretionary prism under which the Bay of Biscay oceanic crust has subducted (Boillot et al, 1979;Déregnaucourt and Boillot, 1982;Boillot and Malod, 1988;Alvarez-Marrón et al, 1997;Ayarza et al, 2004), whereas others do not favor such a southward subduction and postulate for a continuous Moho discontinuity between the margin and the abyssal plain, at least in the longitude of the ESCIN-4 marine profile ( Fig. 1) (Fernández Viejo et al, 1998;Gallastegui et al, 2002;Pedreira et al, 2015). Oceanic crust of the Bay of Biscay, as an appendix of the Atlantic Ocean, is clearly identified by the magnetic anomaly content west of longitude 6°W (Sibuet et al, 2004).…”
Section: Results For the Bay Of Biscaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) can be interpreted as a true accretionary prism under which the Bay of Biscay oceanic crust has subducted (Boillot et al, 1979;Déregnaucourt and Boillot, 1982;Boillot and Malod, 1988;Alvarez-Marrón et al, 1997;Ayarza et al, 2004), whereas others do not favor such a southward subduction and postulate for a continuous Moho discontinuity between the margin and the abyssal plain, at least in the longitude of the ESCIN-4 marine profile ( Fig. 1) (Fernández Viejo et al, 1998;Gallastegui et al, 2002;Pedreira et al, 2015). Oceanic crust of the Bay of Biscay, as an appendix of the Atlantic Ocean, is clearly identified by the magnetic anomaly content west of longitude 6°W (Sibuet et al, 2004).…”
Section: Results For the Bay Of Biscaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) place the Iberian Moho at depths over 50 km in the crustal root Fernández-Viejo et al, 1998), although the model resulting from the former dataset does not show incident rays below 38 km and the latter lacks reversed shots. The models show the Cantabrian-Biscay Moho at ~30 km under the coastline, shallowing to 16-18 km towards the Bay of Biscay (Fig.…”
Section: Results Of the Escin Profiles Across The Cantabrian Mountainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beneath its axial zone, the Moho deepens to 45-50 km (Daignieres et al, 1998;Choukroune and ECORS Team, 1989), while to the east, toward the Mediterranean coast, the Moho rises to ~24 km. The thickened crust extends to the west beneath the Cantabrian Mountains, where the Moho attains a depth of 46-48 km (Pulgar et al, 1996;Fernández-Viejo et al, 1998Díaz et al, 2003). Seismic data for the other major Alpine chains, i.e., the Betics, reveal a crust of ~32 km at the margins, increasing further toward the central zone to ~36-38 km.…”
Section: Crustal Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambiguous evidence of Iberia subduction exists in the area. In fact, while both gravimetric data (Alvarez-Marrón et al, 1997) and seismic velocity modelling S. Tavani: Plate kinematics in the Cantabrian domain 269 (Fernández-Viejo et al, 1998) Fig. 2) shows a repetition of the lower crust-mantle boundary (Ayarza et al, 1998) matching a north-directed subduction of Iberia.…”
Section: The Crustal-scale Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%