2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-011-9267-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal thickness variation across the northeast Iran continental collision zone from teleseismic converted waves

Abstract: For the first time, we present the variation of crust-mantle boundary beneath the northeast Iran continental collision zone which is genetically part of the Alpine-Himalayan orogeny and beneath Central Iran which is a less-deformed tectonic block. The boundary was imaged by stacking teleseismic P-S converted phases and shows a strong variation of Moho from 27.5 km under Central Iran to 55.5 km beneath the Binalud foreland basin. The thickest crust is not located beneath the high topography of the Kopeh Dagh an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Middle East the strongest SKS‐splitting is observed in regions of thin lithosphere and little or no splitting occurs in the region of the thick lithosphere below the Zagros orogen (Figure 8). We have only an upper bound of ∼120 km on the lithospheric thickness in the central Iranian Plateau where receiver function measurements show the crust is 40–45 km thick [ Nowrouzi et al , 2007; Rham , 2009; Motaghi et al , 2011, 2012]. Therefore, the thickness of the mantle layer of the lithosphere is probably <70 km.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the Middle East the strongest SKS‐splitting is observed in regions of thin lithosphere and little or no splitting occurs in the region of the thick lithosphere below the Zagros orogen (Figure 8). We have only an upper bound of ∼120 km on the lithospheric thickness in the central Iranian Plateau where receiver function measurements show the crust is 40–45 km thick [ Nowrouzi et al , 2007; Rham , 2009; Motaghi et al , 2011, 2012]. Therefore, the thickness of the mantle layer of the lithosphere is probably <70 km.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S‐delays computed for the surface wave tomographic model show a similar SW‐to‐NE trend in delay time with early arrivals in the Zagros as do the observed S‐wave residuals uncorrected for crustal structure. After correcting the S‐wave residuals for lateral variations in crustal thickness and velocity along the profile (Figure 5d) by using results from crustal receiver function inversions [ Nowrouzi et al , 2007; Rham , 2009; Motaghi et al , 2011, 2012], we found much earlier arrival times for stations in the Zagros (∼−4 sec), ones that are suppressed in Figure 5cdue to the thick (50–55 km) and somewhat slower Zagros crust compared to that in central Iran (35–40 km). The IIEES‐LGIT and IIEES‐UCam experiments were operated at different times and have no sites in common.…”
Section: Upper Mantle Shear Wave Structure Of the Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Central Iran, show a rather simple structure compared with those obtained from stations that are located over the mountain ranges. Some examples of the calculated PRFs are given by Motaghi et al (2012a).…”
Section: -1-calculation Of P-wave Receiver Function (Prf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crustal thickness is large beneath Zagros (~50 km) and it increases beneath SSZ and UDMA where it reaches its maximum ~59 km. To the north, a smooth decrease is seen at the south and middle of Central Iran, reaching its local minimum at the middle of Central Iran, ~35 km Motaghi et al (2012a). A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T used a migration method described byZhu and Kanamori (2000) to migrate P-to-S converted waves from the Moho boundary (extracted from stacked PRFs) to the Moho depth and report an even thinner crust ~ 27.5 km.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%