2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure of the Lofoten–Vesterålen continental margin, off Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Faeroe-Shetland Basin, the Late Paleocene-Early Eocene phase coincides with a strong unconformity and prograding sands and mudstone sequences offshore Faeroes (Sørensen et al, 2003). Along the Northeast Greenland shelf, five sequences of eastward prograding wedges document a strong uplift of the Greenlandic mainland from Paleocene to Early Eocene time (Tsikalas et al, 2005). Fig.…”
Section: Uplift History Of the Marginsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the Faeroe-Shetland Basin, the Late Paleocene-Early Eocene phase coincides with a strong unconformity and prograding sands and mudstone sequences offshore Faeroes (Sørensen et al, 2003). Along the Northeast Greenland shelf, five sequences of eastward prograding wedges document a strong uplift of the Greenlandic mainland from Paleocene to Early Eocene time (Tsikalas et al, 2005). Fig.…”
Section: Uplift History Of the Marginsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1), the initial oceanic crust is ~12 -15 km thick (Tsikalas et al, 2005). A LCB is documented seaward of the shelf edge.…”
Section: Volume Of Magmatismmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such elongate "edge effect" positive gravity anomalies are considered commonly observed features at passive continental margins [Rabinowitz and LaBrecque, 1979;Watts and Fairhead, 1999]; however, due to the inherent ambiguity in potential field interpretations, the genetic cause of these anomalies is not always clear. In particular, their cause has been ascribed in many margins to the difference in depth to major lateral, near-seafloor density contrasts and the equivalent depth difference of base crust compensation [e.g., Talwani and Eldholm, 1972;Tsikalas et al, 2005]. These "edge effect" positive gravity anomalies have also been interpreted as caused by the juxtaposition of continental and oceanic crust [Rabinowitz and LaBrecque, 1979;Bauer et al, 2000], as well as due to magmatic underplating [e.g., Watts, 2001].…”
Section: Margin Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model predicts the occurrence of crustal-scale shear zones that are able to thin the crust to less than 10 km, without the presence of distributed normal faulting in the upper crust [Lavier and Manatschal, 2006]. At the same time, even minor shallowing of the Moho may lead to decompressional melts that are accreted on to the lower crust thereby increasing its density [e.g., Tsikalas et al, 2005]. Consequently thermal subsidence will enhance the accumulation of relatively thick and tectonically undeformed "sag" basins (Figures 15a and 15b) [e.g., Huismans and Beaumont, 2008].…”
Section: Total Rift Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%