2013
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure of the Carpathian–Pannonian region from ambient noise tomography

Abstract: We use ambient noise tomography to investigate the crust and uppermost mantle structure beneath the Carpathian-Pannonian region of Central Europe. Over 7500 Rayleigh wave empirical Green's functions are derived from interstation cross-correlations of vertical component ambient seismic noise recordings (2005-2011) using a temporary network of 54 stations deployed during the South Carpathian Project (2009-2011), 56 temporary stations deployed in the Carpathian Basins Project (2005)(2006)(2007) and 100 permanent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
23
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
7
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…. More recently, the analysis of ambient seismic noise from a basin-wide array of broad-band seismic recorders has enabled the application of tomographic techniques to determine a new high-resolution crustal velocity model for the entire region(Ren et al, 2013). This model is in broad agreement with prior compilations of controlled source data(Grad et al, 2009;Tesauro et al, 2008) but important differences emerge in specific places that have not previously been traversed by reflection / refraction profiles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. More recently, the analysis of ambient seismic noise from a basin-wide array of broad-band seismic recorders has enabled the application of tomographic techniques to determine a new high-resolution crustal velocity model for the entire region(Ren et al, 2013). This model is in broad agreement with prior compilations of controlled source data(Grad et al, 2009;Tesauro et al, 2008) but important differences emerge in specific places that have not previously been traversed by reflection / refraction profiles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…1). Figure 6 shows the interpreted crustal structure and velocity section We also compare our RF Moho depth picks with shear-wave velocity sections taken from a recent tomographic inversion of crustal velocities determined from surface wave analysis (ambient noise correlation) by Ren et al (2013). On the CBP2x and CBP3x profiles, the RF Moho picks generally are within the range V S = 3.7-3.9 km/s (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison To Prior Studies Of Seismic Structurementioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sabra et al, 2005a;Shapiro et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2007;Cho et al, 2007;Bensen et al, 2009) and 2) time-frequency phase weighted stacking (tf-PWS) described by Schimmel and Gallart (2007), which has been applied in some recent ambient seismic noise tomography studies (e.g. Ren et al, 2013;Dias et al, 2015).…”
Section: Correlation Analysis and Stackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the measurement time depends on station distance, the shorter the distance, the lesser the time required (Sabra et al, 2005b;Gouedard et al, 2008). This method can be equally well used on continental (Yang et al, 2007;Bensen et al, 2009), regional (Szanyi et al, 2013;Ren et al, 2013;Dias et al, 2015), local (Renalier et al, 2010;Stankiewicz et al, 2012) and engineering-geotechnical scale (Picozzi et al, 2009;De Nisco and Nunziata, 2011;Pilz et al, 2012Pilz et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%