2019
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure of the Carpathian Orogen in Romania from receiver functions and ambient noise tomography: how craton collision, subduction and detachment affect the crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5c). The relative dominance of M≥ 6 earthquakes in this depth range has been related to the reverse faulting mechanism in this depth range (Radulian et al 2007;Petrescu et al 2019). The possible https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-230 Preprint.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5c). The relative dominance of M≥ 6 earthquakes in this depth range has been related to the reverse faulting mechanism in this depth range (Radulian et al 2007;Petrescu et al 2019). The possible https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-230 Preprint.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. explanation of the pattern of earthquakes has been divided in the following two categories; (1) it might be associated with descending relic ocean lithospheric beneath the bending zone of the SE Carpathians , or (2) it might be associated to continental lithosphere that has been delaminated, after the collision (Bokelmann and Rodler, 2014;Petrescu et al 2019). These frequent earthquakes in the region have caused many landslides and any major future earthquake might have ground effects in a much larger area (150000 km 2 ), possibly causing more landslides (Havenith et al 2016).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the studies by Burov & Cloetingh (2009, 2010), no new attempts have been made to investigate plume‐lithosphere interaction as the driving mechanism for subduction‐like downward movements of the continental lithosphere. This is still the case despite a growing body of robust geophysical data, including observations from seismic tomography and magneto‐telluric sounding in areas such as the Caucasus (Ismail‐Zadeh et al., 2020; Koulakov et al., 2012; Zabelina et al., 2016); Central Asia (He & Santosh, 2018); North‐East China (Kuritani et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2018; Zhang, 2012); Iberia and its margins (Civiero et al., 2019); the Carpathians (e.g., Wortel & Spakman, 2000; Koulakov et al., 2010; Ismail‐Zadeh et al., 2012; Ádám et al., 2017; Petrescu et al., 2019), and the Colorado Plateau (Levander et al., 2011) where upwelling of hot mantle material flanked by downgoing slabs of sinking mantle lithosphere has been recently documented. This makes plume‐induced intra‐continental mantle sinking/foundering a viable and testable mechanism, deserving detailed investigation by means of both modeling and critical analysis of pertinent observations.…”
Section: Subduction Initiation: a Survey Of Mechanisms And Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-Miocene indicators of deformation suggest that the Pannonian Basin has shortened in the past 5 Ma, most likely due to the continuous push of Adria, although recent structural measurements and present-day geodetic measurements indicate small surface strain rates (Bada et al, 2007). Beneath the Carpathian bend zone, high rates of seismicity are associated with an anomalous lithospheric block (Ren et al, 2012) that is stretching as it sinks into the mantle (Lorinczi and Houseman, 2009) and may be actively detaching from the overlying cratonic lithosphere (Gîrbacea and Frisch, 1998;Knapp et al, 2005;Petrescu et al, 2019). The Pannonian-Carpathian system is thus an excellent craton-orogen tectonic system, where we can address long-standing issues of mantle deformation in response to changing surface kinematics, to assess the complex flow field across tectonic units of variable ages and around a localised zone of intermediate-depth seismicity at the craton margin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%