2011
DOI: 10.1029/2011gc003563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure and evolution beneath the Colorado Plateau and the southern Basin and Range Province: Results from receiver function and gravity studies

Abstract: [1] Over the past several decades, contrasting models have been proposed for the physical and chemical processes responsible for the uplift and long-term stability of the Colorado Plateau (CP) and crustal thinning beneath the Basin and Range Province (BRP) in the southwestern United States. Here we provide new constraints on the models by modeling gravity anomalies and by systematically analyzing over 15,500 P-to-S receiver functions recorded at 72 USArray and other broadband seismic stations on the southweste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(235 reference statements)
12
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As another example, our estimates of crustal thickness are in excellent agreement with those obtained by Frassetto et al () in the CP. Likewise, our estimates beneath stations shown in Figure a (except for R17A) agree closely with the crustal thicknesses calculated by Bashir et al (). Finally, the general pattern of our crustal thickness map is similar to that estimated by Purevsuren (), particularly in the western margins of the CP where a thick crust (∼50 km) was reported by this author.…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As another example, our estimates of crustal thickness are in excellent agreement with those obtained by Frassetto et al () in the CP. Likewise, our estimates beneath stations shown in Figure a (except for R17A) agree closely with the crustal thicknesses calculated by Bashir et al (). Finally, the general pattern of our crustal thickness map is similar to that estimated by Purevsuren (), particularly in the western margins of the CP where a thick crust (∼50 km) was reported by this author.…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite some localized differences (e.g., near the Kaibab uplift, west of the Grand Canyon), the overall pattern of crustal thickness derived here is similar to that reported in numerous previous studies (e.g., Bashir et al, ; Frassetto et al, ; Gilbert & Sheehan, ; Gilbert et al, ; Gilbert, ; Hansen et al, ; Lowry & Pérez‐Gussinyé, ; Prodehl & Pakiser, ; Purevsuren, ; Sheehan et al, ; Shen et al, ; Velasco, ; Zandt et al, ), pointing towards a general agreement for the region. For example, thick crust (∼>46 km) found beneath the SRM (e.g., Bailey et al, ; Gilbert & Sheehan, ; Gilbert, ; Prodehl & Pakiser, ; Shen et al, ; Shen et al, ; Shen & Ritzwoller, ) is broadly consistent with our results.…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the pre-melt V p and values used in Watanabe [1993] are comparable with typical V p values used for RF stacking and the resulting values beneath continental areas such as the Limpopo belt in southern Africa [Nair et al, 2006] and the Colorado Plateau and the Basin and Range Province in North America [Bashir et al, 2011].…”
Section: Crustal Seismic Velocities and Meltmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…1). A range of datasets, including crustal structure and thickness, stress orientations, volcanism, seismicity, heat flow, and gravity, suggest that the ATZ represents a tectonic transition between the thick and relatively stable crust of the CP and the thin and highly-extended crust of the southern B&R (Brumbaugh, 1987;Hendricks and Plescia, 1991;Thompson and Zoback, 1979;Frassetto et al, 2006;Bashir et al, 2011;Gilbert, 2012). However, these transitions do not strictly occur along the physiographic boundaries, and the tectonic evolution of the region remains enigmatic (e.g., Menges and Pearthree, 1989).…”
Section: Regional Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 98%